Top films: The best family fare from 2011
Rated PG-13 for some sexual references and smoking
Common Sense Media recommends ages 14+
Released May 20.
The best Woody Allen film in years features Owen Wilson as a contemporary screenwriter who finds himself transported back in time to 1920s Paris and face-to-face with literary legends like F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway. Long-time Deseret News film critic Chris Hicks chose this as his favorite film of the year, noting that Allen "struck gold with this one, a romantic fantasy that is charming, funny and completely winning."
Common Sense Media recommends ages 14+
Released May 20.
The best Woody Allen film in years features Owen Wilson as a contemporary screenwriter who finds himself transported back in time to 1920s Paris and face-to-face with literary legends like F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway. Long-time Deseret News film critic Chris Hicks chose this as his favorite film of the year, noting that Allen "struck gold with this one, a romantic fantasy that is charming, funny and completely winning."

Login to comment
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular Across Site
- My husband Alex Boye grilled in UK for 'I'm a...
- Gunman caught after shooting father-in-law in...
- Video: Miss Utah USA flubs answer at Miss USA...
- BYU football: Cougars must secure their own...
- Ogden man shot as he knelt to pray is...
- Survey: Gay and lesbian population has unique...
- Dick Harmon: Bronco Mendenhall and Cecil O....
- Utah Jazz: Massive, state-of-the-art...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Blogs



I loved Hugo! Great film with a wonderful story.
D.N., as much as everyone likes a 'top 10' list- there are a few online trends worth keeping up with. Listing all films on one page would be less tedious and for those who have slower connections, would be an easier format to use. This is nothing more than a friendly suggestion.
Article, on "Courageous": "...even though the acting is mediocre and Christian themes are bluntly overt... only 37 percent of critics liked the films while a whopping 93 percent of audience attendees liked it."
I would hope that a Top Ten list would consider the technical merits of a film as well as the thematic content. It's hard to see how a film that even the compiler of the list concedes has mediocre acting and clumsy screenwriting could qualify as a Top Ten film.
The gap between critics and viewers in the Rotten Tomatoes ratings is easy to explain. Critics are looking at the film as a whole, as a creative work of art, and responding to the quality of the script, acting, and production values, which even the DesNews writer admits are not great. Viewers are reacting from the gut with a more emotional response that is related to the theme of the film. Also, for a niche film like "Courageous," only people predisposed to like it are likely to see it. It's not hard to imagine that the viewer ratings are pumped up by highly motivated group of viewers actively trying to raise its profile.