Quantcast

Rand Paul didn't break any records: history's longest filibusters

Published: Thursday, March 7 2013 1:19 p.m. MST

Senator recites Shakespeare during filibusters Next List » 6 of 6 « Prev
Washington Post
Sen. Huey Long, D-La., opposed bills he thought favored the rich over the poor during the 1930s.

In 1935, he held a filibuster for 15 hours and 30 minutes because he wanted to require Senate confirmation for some New Deal employees, according to the Washington Post.

Long gave an entertaining filibuster that included his reciting Shakespeare and reading out recipes for fried oysters and “pot likkers."
Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Liberal Ted
Salt Lake City, UT

Sen. William Proxmire. D-Wis

Why can't we have more Democrats and Republicans like this leader? Could you imagine if 70-80% of our current leaders and the president felt the same way.

We would have a balanced budget. We wouldn't be talking about extending the debt "false" ceiling. We wouldn't be talking about raising taxes on the "wealthy" ie everyone that works.

God bless Sen. William Proxmire. If I lived back then I would have helped him to keep it going until it was a constiutional amendment to balance the budget, never borrow and always maintain a surplus.

worf
Mcallen, TX

Seems our political leaders are more concerned with re-elections then serving the country.

Like water to a thirsty man.

Great to see someone with backbone defending the Constitution.

Oatmeal
Woods Cross, UT

Paul is another right-wing whacko.

worf
Mcallen, TX

Obama vs Rand Paul-- in the sport of common sense, patriotism, and preserving the Constitution:

Rand Paul 75
Obama 3

MapleDon
Springville, UT

I'm glad Senator Paul raised this issue. I thought it was a brilliant move on his part. Obviously, the left will criticize. That's expected.

A1994
Centerville, UT

@Oatmeal

So are you okay with left-wing wackos in control of drones that may or may not kill someone here in America? Open your eyes!

konan19
LEHI, UT

I don't get it. Why'd Paul quit? Did he win?

Midwest Mom
Soldiers Grove, WI

I would have thought that his message was more important than how long he stood talking.

JWB
Kaysville, UT

Our campaigns are on marketing tools. Governance isn't part of the win they want. I don't think President Bush really enjoyed the part of governing after 9/11. I can still see his face in Florida at the school. It was of shock and disbelief. He didn't have the real temperament to be at war and I believe he realized part of that when he quit the Air Force while flying aircraft as a first-lieutenant. Running a business is much different. You aren't ordering people to die on the battlefield for the cause of truth and justice plus freedoms, if the other people understand what freedom is.

This President knew he was getting into an era of war. I don't think John McCain as President would have had an easy time with Afghanistan and Iraq, even though he was extremely courageous for all of us in the military while as a POW enduring years of pain and sacrifice for us. However, he would have had the right people to balance the process out.

This President as a Commander-in-Chief didn't have any background in business to be able to handle the logistics of a war and of military.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments