Six bills generating debate, disagreement in the Utah Legislature this year

Published: Tuesday, March 5 2013 8:15 a.m. MST

Scott G Winterton, Deseret News
If the Utah Legislature passes certain bills this year, people may no longer be able to smoke in a car with a minor present, and gun owners could carry concealed weapons without a permit.

Here's a look at six bills that have generated a lot of debate on and off Utah's Capitol Hill during the 2013 legislative session.

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Salt Lake City, UT

Article, quoting Sen. Christensen: "He said cockfighting is not wonderful, but the birds 'NATURALLY want to do this thing in their lives...'" [emphasis added]

Funny. In all my years raising poultry, I never once saw a rooster strap a blade to its leg and hop into an arena to fight another bird. A certain amount of aggression is natural in fowl and they can be harsh to the sick and weak, but the forced duel to the death world of cockfighting is not the least bit natural.

Roosevelt, UT

If Utah has cockfighting or not I am betting it is not going to be a mecca for gamblers etc.

The state is going to allow anyone to carry concealed weapons because some hunters fear geting their guns wet? Instead of punishing the entire state how about requiring those hunters to carry guns that are all weather? Really.....just think about it.

Instead of getting guns back in the hands of disturbed individuals why not make it mandatory that anyone who commits a crime punishable by jail that they receive a lifetime ban on any guns. I have noted that guns and crimes are connected in many cases but not all. Lead the pack in a new direction Utah.

And for blowing smoke on kids in a vehicle people will be fined $45? Really that is it? $45 is not an amount that strikes fear into the hearts of the population. If it was a $500 figure it would help the children and pay for the officer to write the citation. The $45 does not even pay for an officer to write the ticket or the gas to put in his car.

Healthy Skeptic
Saratoga Springs, UT

It is not the role of the State to "allow" certain activities. The presumption is that an individual has the liberty to perfrom ANY action that pleases. The Government's role is to protect that liberty, while protecting the liberties of other individuals. Bearing a firearm does not infringe upon any other individual's right of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Rather than outlaw guns, the government should pass a law that they cannot be used to harm others...

Outlawing guns would likely be as successful as outlawing drugs.

The question "should government allow..." might well be asked in a dictatorship, but here in the USA, the question is "should government DIS-allow". If the activity does not infringe upon another's rights, the answer to that question should be "NO". We the people have not granted the government that power.

Kaysville, UT

You left a really big one off the list: Moving the State Prison. But it seems like the Leg and the Deseret News want to quiet things so it can be push through.

casual observer
Salt Lake City, UT

The permissive gun bills defy rational comment since they have not passed the smell test.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments