Reader comments: God's Army
BRETT | Mar. 22, 2005
For all you people who didn't like the movie, I loved this
movie. This movie makes me want to go on a mission. That
acting was great and the story was good. It was also pretty
funny although it did get serious at the end. Overall it was
a good LDS movie.
DAN | Dec. 26, 2002
Uncomfortable, a complete waste of time.
VECTORAN | Oct. 28, 2002
I would've given it 3 1/2, but since it wasn't a choice,
I'll just go with 4 stars. A good revealing look at the
missionary field, as it was seen by Richard Dutcher on his
mission. I think that we (Mormons) too often idealize the
missionaries, who are real people with real problems and
weaknesses. I'm eighteen and I know what kind of jokes my
age group likes to pull, and the humorous scenes of this
movie perfectly reflect that. And it's refreshing to see
that Dutcher doesn't apologize for portraying people the
way they are. The film managed to be spiritual as well,
though not in the conventional manner that Utahns or
mainstream Mormons are used to; besides, what's wrong with
something a little different?
Overall the movie was well-crafted, I enjoyed the story,
and overall I enjoyed the whole movie. A very good LDS
movie, for members and non-members alike.
DAVID VANLANGEVELD | Sept. 15, 2002
If you always wanted to know what LDS missionaries do on
their missions and/or you wanted to see a film that really
discusses the nature of faith, look no further than "God's
Army". Richard Dutcher, writer, director, and star of the
film, does an excellent job of portraying the essentials of
the LDS mission experience and explores issues both unique
to the LDS faith as well as general to almost all Christian
religions. And he does it without trying to convert the
audience to the LDS faith.
The only drawbacks to the film are the mission president
who comes across as extremely stiff and a rough start.
However, if you can survive the first 10 minutes of the
film, you are in for a thought-provoking experience that
few Hollywood films can give.
CONNIE PHILLIPS | Jul. 19, 2001
I TOTALLY disagree with you Mr. Jones! I think Richard
Dutcher is a very talented Movie Maker and I applaud him
for
his ability to go against the grain and make such a
wonderful movie! I also think there is nothing wrong with
marrying a former Sister missionary..They were done with
their missions were they not??? It takes a very strong
person to continue to make movies as he has when he has so
many people ridiculing him for making them in the first
place. I hope he keeps it up!!!
BRETT BENSON | Apr. 18, 2001
This was the funniest movie I have ever seen in 32 years.
I literally could not breathe (laughing so hard) during the
scene when "Pops" is found dead by his companion and the
scene where the crippled young man is healed by a
priesthood blessing and walks into the kitchen where
everyone is eating cold cereal. What made that scenes so
hilarious is that the movie portrayed these as "normal"
mission experiences. Further, the movie would have you
believe that all the sisters on a mission look like Cindy
Crawford and that it is okay for the elders to pursue and
marry the sister missionaries. I could go on and on.
Suffice it to say this was one great movie!!!
DON JONES | Feb. 5, 2001
Recently, I requested that my teenage children borrow a
copy of ?God?s Army? from a former Bishop of our ward, who
had recently shown it at a youth activity. To say that I
was shocked, would be an understatement.
After viewing it as a family, I quizzed the members of my
household. To my chagrin, they each saw nothing
particularly wrong with the film. This is consistent with
the myriad of good reviews the film has received. However,
once I began to point out the films many flaws ? anti-
mormon themes, their eyes began to be opened.
Richard Dutcher has done a great disservice to the church.
He has worked his vendetta against mission presidents,
parents, and God into a smartly woven irreverent tale.
This film has the potential of deceiving even the very
elect. The film does have value. It is an excellent
illustration of how wolfs can enter into the flock in
sheep?s clothing, and devour in unexpected ways. Richard
Dutcher is a wolf, a clever wolf. This is a film designed
to raise doubt and lower testimony. It is a dangerous
movie. I hope others will see it (only) for the what is
really is.
Don Jones
L MEADE | Jul. 24, 2000
I really enjoyed the movie. It was so good to see 'us
Mormons' portrayed as real people for the world to see.I
dont think those who are not LDS or who are anti-mormon can
really have anything to take issue with. I can not argue
with the writers opinion of the Mission President and one
would not wish for a false representation to be made but
could a MP really be that ostear? My husband (who's a
Bishop) was worried about somethings in there being taken
the wrong way by those who do not understand the LDS
culture but I think those things are perhaps what will
prompt the 'seeking' non member into action. Yes I liked it
very much. When my son gets to Utah this week he's going
to see it. I'm sure he'll enjoy it. Are you going to
release it here in England- at least on video? Please do!
JUDY KING | Jul. 14, 2000
Ilooked forward to seeing this movie and was very happy
when it was brought back to San Diego. I went to the first
showing of the run, and was disappointed to find myself
nearly alone in the theatre. I was not disappointed in the
movie however. The actors were believable and the story
was touching. I laughed... I cried... I left the theatre
wishing that I had someone to share with. I will go again
and take my grandchildren.
PETE SANDERS | Jun. 21, 2000
Jacque Gray is a babe!
ANONYMOUS | Jun. 20, 2000
Wonderful!!! Everyone, LDS or not, should see it!
JASON SAMS | Jun. 17, 2000
I think that this movie is a cheap rip off for the LDS
church to make more money. Had they thought about other
people in the world, such as other religions, maybe this
movie would have been a greater success. When I heard the
title I thought of God's actuall army, like angels, not
missionaries. If the Mormon church feels that it needs more
money and followers, why dont you just start baptizing at
conception, instead of waiting until they are eight years
old and bring in some small amount of money. Whether you
agree with me or not, is totally up to you, but when your
church attacks the world of fellow churches, then it
involves me. Also, I would like to add, that you are bias
to movies that pertain to only non-sexual things. Also, the
"MO MO" church aught to begin to think of letting people
make the decision to become a certain religion, not shove
it down their thoat like they did in this movie. (it is
also like that in real life.)
Thank you for hearing my opinon,
Jason
LOUIS E. DEAUX | Jun. 10, 2000
As a former missionary (England Southwest 1972-1974), I
easily identified
with much of the fare delivered by God's Army - both the
good and the difficult. We didn't collect cockroaches but
mice were certainly plentiful in the 200-400 year old digs
we frequented. The movie was a very real
shadow of memories past.
My recollection of most missionaries I served with is that
they came with many types of baggage - some of it very hard
to overcome. Having served with Mark Hoffman (of fraud and
murder fame), it can sadly be stated that the tale of a
young elder concentrating his efforts in the wrong place
can
also be personally destructive. As for myself, a convert
of
but two years when called to serve, God's Army was a
refreshing look at the fact that among Mormons, there are
pioneers in every generation.
Not all of them crossed the dusty plains in covered wagons.
I was turned
out of house and home at gunpoint. There always being a
greater
sacrifice, my mission president paired me with a young
Elder
(Dracocardos) who was forcefully turned out of his native
Rhodes and Greece in the same fashion for making the same
choice.
We witnessed the same miricles and were touched in similar
ways to a conversion of faith. God's Army is to life
members - a treat; to
converts, a deeper look at the sacrifice wrung from dirty
streets to seek
each soul. To me, a convert who served a mission, it is
simply wonderful to see a filmmaker who understands
something that is so difficult to explain in worldly ways.
I watched God's Army with my son (age 14) and just of a
handful of other
Mormons in a crowded casino based theater (Las Vegas,
Nevada). At the end of God's Army, I was surprised to
witness a crowd of mostly gamblers and tourists, sinners of
sorts, take considerable time to applaud and cry a great
deal.
That's not sappy or contrived. That's real!
Louis E. Deaux
England Southwest and Bristol Mission
September of 1972 to September of 1974
STEPHEN | Jun. 9, 2000
My wife and I went to see this one after it had been out
for a month. Unlike most movies where the crowd gets thinner
after three weeks, this house was packed. Just like this
review section there was polarization. At least three people
left in the middle..Who cares why.
I was shocked by the blessing, and the prayers. But I
reflected that, perhaps, these things need not be hidden
since there is nothing to be ashamed of. People really
should know what is going on.
The mission president seemed a bit calouse, the
missionaries a little frat house. Maybe I missed something
but I was touched several times by the message.
This was one of the most moving theater experiences I have
ever had.
ALVA MAUGHAN | Jun. 8, 2000
I saw this movie with some family members while visiting in
AZ. Being out east I really hadn't heard much about it, but
being a returned sister missionary made me want to see it.
At first I didn't think it was realistic because the
Mission President came across like an army sargeant. I had
two mission presidents and they were MUCH nicer! Another
thing, the Elders apartment was too CLEAN for a real Elders
apartment! Ha, ha! We had a saying in my mission, "The best
kept secret in the Church is what a mission is really
like." I thought this movie portrayed "mission life"
fairly accurately. While watching the movie I remembered
what it felt like being "green" and tracting for the first
time. We had a few missionaries get on a bus and leave too.
I enjoyed my mission and am glad I went, but I will be the
first to tell my 3 sons, it wasn't all warm fuzzies and
smiles. I think the movie did a good job at showing both
sides, but maybe could have shown more of the good. Like
how close you get to the other missionaries. If it had
been in my mission and an Elder died we would have all been
bawling our eyes out standing in that airplane hangor. The
only thing I felt uncomfortable with in the movie were the
priesthood blessings. Thanks!
NOT NECESSARY | May. 30, 2000
I was looking forward to watching God's Army because first
of all, I am LDS, and second of all, I love missionary work
and admire and respect missionaries. However during the
film, I was deeply disturbed by the things that were shown
on the big screen. I felt the fact that blessings were
given and prayers were said for all audiences to watch was
very wrong. These things are not to be shared on the big
screen with people who don't have an understanding of how
important and special these are. Is it any wonder that the
church does not also do movies that show these kinds of
priesthood blessings. Also, the fact that a blessing was
given which allowed a cripled man to walk after many years
was a bit too much for a movie like this. It can give the
impression that it happens that often. The story line was
good and emotions were high at times. However I think you
could have done without many things that are extremely
questionable. I think this movie will have a great deal of
negative effect outside of Utah. Just remember the whole
world is not mormon and not everyone understands our mormon
language.
SHARON WALKER | May. 30, 2000
I took a non-member friend to this movie. Actually I drove
and he paid the way. My sister told me about it and I was
afraid it wouldn't come to our area so was excited when it
did. I had good feelings when we left the movie...as we
were walking to the car we walked past a tavern and my
friend said,"would you like to go in for a beer?" I
said "no, but I wouldn't want to keep you from doing
anything that you want to do." ( He doesn't drink either.)
We laughed together. I didn't ask him if he enjoyed the
movie. He said to me,"thanks for taking me to the movie." I
laughed and said,"no,thank you for paying." I do want to
see it again but with my children and grandchildren. It's
going to cost me next time around, but I feel the money
will be very well spent.
TIMOTHY KILLIAN | May. 30, 2000
Perhaps a different perspective on the film "God's Army."
My wife and I saw the film this afternoon in Seattle. We
are
both returned missionaries, temple-married, and no longer
active in the church.
On a purely personal level, it is impossible for any former-
missionary not to identify with this film. This is our
culture, and this picture "captures" many aspects of that
unique experience. On this level, we both enjoyed the movie
for allowing us to visit and relive moments. We may
recommend this film to several friends purely for them to
get a glimpse of what life was like as a mormon missionary.
On a "film-critical" level, the movie was weak. The story-
line was simple and predictable. The characters barely more
than 2-dimensional. Mormons are raised in a media-savvy
culture, yet are media-starved for images of "real"
mormons,
and this film gives a quick fix.
I spent a bit of time on the "Zion Films" website. They
draw
references to "Fiddler On The Roof" stating that it
remained
true to the tenets of Judaism, while still presenting a
powerful, and non-denominational story of human-nature.
They
have set a lofty goal for themselves. Indeed, Richard
Dutcher, in his script, made another Jewish reference by
refering to one of my favorite books "My Name Is Asher Lev"
by Chaim Potok. I think it is clear where Dutcher wants to
go. The question is, did he get there? Is he even heading
in
the right direction?
My answer would be an easy one: no. For those of us who
have
paid attention to mormon media and entertainment for years,
the "Fiddler On the Roof" analogy is well-known. But,
here's
the very distinct difference between mormonism and judaism:
judaism does not actively proselyte for new members. Nor is
it controlled by the "center" of an organized church.
"Fiddler On The Roof" works because it's creators most
likely were less concerned with converting the gentiles
than
they were with creating a moving story of drama about the
human condition.
"God's Army", though mild, is still a proselyting film. And
though it is not a church-affiliated or sanctioned film, it
certainly isn't far from such. And why? Because mormons
wouldn't tolerate it if it weren't. Even the minor areas in
which it "pokes" the envelope are very simplistic and safe.
I read one review on nauvoo.com that claimed this movie was
"brutally honest." Can they be serious? If Dutcher had
wanted "brutal" honesty in his film, there are plenty of
stories to explore. But, I would guess that what Dutcher
wanted was a marketable film...one that he could sell not
to
the main-stream movie audience, but to main-stream mormons.
Which is fine, and is probably ripe for further
development.
But, don't kid yourself that this movie is ready to be
released to and embraced by non-mormons. When I watch
"Fiddler On the Roof," my jewish friends aren't hanging on
my every emotional response to the movie, hoping that I
will
"feel" the spirit and recognize the absolute truth of
Judaism. I can envision legions of mormons inviting their
non-member friends to this "independent" film with ulterior
motives.
In the end, I applaud Dutcher for his efforts, and wish him
well. You "active" mormons have given him a very tall
order,
and not much latitude. Even as safe as this film was, I
still see lots of complaining about this or that small
element of the story.
I too long for films that include mormonism in a real and
honest light. But, from my perspective, this film does not
get there. "Brutal" honesty can only occur without regard
for its consequences...and this film is very safe. But then
again, this is only our first "date" with a new film maker.
Let's hope his next effort goes a bit deeper, and that his
audience will allow him to do so.
LES GRIPKEY | May. 26, 2000
God's Army is the best movie I've seen in a long, long
time.
I loved it! I'm a non-LDS church member who drove an hour
each way to see it, and then did it again a second time.
While I have a longtime interest in Mormon history and
culture I was surprised that my wife (who does not
particularly share this interest) also really liked the
movie, as did another non-Mormon (Muslim) friend. God's
Army
is a spiritual journey made rich by the universal human
struggles and strivings of the young people on that
journey.
Their questions, missteps, and mistakes make their
yearning
for, and grasping of the sacred powerful and real--and an
inspiration for the rest of us imperfect spiritual seekers.
Les Gripkey
MISSY | May. 8, 2000
I thought this was a really good movie and that everyone
should go see it
CYNTHIA | May. 1, 2000
I enjoyed the movie. It did not tarnish my testimony. If it
portrayed the missionaries in more "human" moments so be
it. It didn't bother me. They are young men and the
immaturity comes out. In spite of that, they still can
get the job done! I am grateful for the missionary program,
without it I would still be in darkness. I joined and yes
the missionaries did let their hair down at times with me,
but the message is true and they were wonderful examples to
me, both male and female missionaries. By their fruits ye
shall know them.
I was surprised to read in one of the reviews that a lot of
the cast was non LDS. I would have preferred that they were
mostly LDS simply because there is a lot of talent within
the Church itself that should be tapped. Especially since
so much of what Hollywood produces a faithful LDS person
would not want to be involved in. I am curious to know who
was and who wasn't. The costar Dutcher is LDS but the
others now I am wondering about.
I wouldn't mind seeing the movie again.
LEN NOBLE | May. 1, 2000
AWESOME, is the only word I can think of. What a great
missionary tool. I have a son just returned from a mission
and one in Brazil. I know a lot of this was right-on. I
felt the Spirit about 4 times real strong during the movie.
I went on opening night and the place was packed, also lots
of people were waiting to enter as we came out. THANKS for
bringing the Spirit to the neighborhood theaters.It's been
a
long time comming. Ca. Sister
CARL N. CARTER | Apr. 28, 2000
The cheap shots were cheap. The humor was sophomoric and
not representative of the majority of missionaries I have
known. There are some things that should not be
trivialized no matter what audience the filmaker is wishing
to reach. There were some teachings that raised legitimate
questions, but the film was too shallow to answer them in a
meaningful way and it appeared to me that the missionaries
did not have answers for investigators questions. They were
nearly APOLOGETIC that they did not know the truthful
reponses! The notion that this film was "spiritual" is
wrong. It may have been "emotional" but I was left feeling
quite uneasy about the treatment of sacred things on film.
This film was mediocre as art and I would not recommend it
to anyone.
GRANT JOHNSON | Apr. 28, 2000
The fellow from AZ needs to be a little less self righteous
about the movie. It is too easy to condemn the work that
others have done, and Richard Drutcher has done it his
way. Look around in your own wards, and you will find
people of all walks of life. Differences. This movie is no
different. If the man from AZ had the talent to make a
movie, I am sure it would be appropriate for a temple ready
audience, but this movie is reaching a different audience,
on purpose. That's the goal, and I love it. I am thrilled
to see this kind of thing happening.
Sure, I wish all missionaries could be like Ammon. But this
movie is realistic. I had missionaries yelling at me on my
mission, there was some contention from time to time, it
was not all roses. It is the way it really is. I wonder of
the man from AZ has served a mission to know the vast cross
section of spirituality that exists in the mission field?
Anyway, God's Army is a good step in the right direction
for an LDS made film.
P. GILBERT | Apr. 26, 2000
We loved this movie. My kids and I have seen it twice and
they loved it too. I think it shows what it really is like
for a missionary and the struggles he has to go through and
for those of us who have never been on a mission, it lets
us
see what its like. I love movies that make you laugh and
cry
and this definitely does that. We will definitely buy this
one if it comes available. I am especially grateful for a
movie the whole family can see!! We need more of these
kinds
of movies!
M HOLDAWAY | Apr. 24, 2000
In my opinion this movie is a good example of taking sacred
ordinances and making a public display. The film played on
the emotions of people at times which some may interpret as
being spiritually uplifting. I felt this movie lacked a
true perspective of missionary work and what most
missionaries are like in their efforts. Of course, there
were elements that where accurate as far as the temperment
of 19 through 21 year olds, but most were seriously
exagerated.
The mission president was not like any mission president I
have known. There was no sensitivity toward new
missionaries and he was represented more of a hard-nose
coach rather than a spiritual anchor. Comments from the
Mission President were questionable at best, even when
speaking over the casket of a dead missionary.
The missionaries represented seemed to have more of a
worldly demeanor, most having some kind of problem. The
movie depicted a feeling that there was a general struggle
with testimony, and certainly lacking in spirituality.
Of course, there are those exceptions that may fall into
the category portrayed, but the movie represented these as
the typical and normal.
Prayers were said, and rather than being sacred and humble
in nature, they were with eyes open and done superficially
in representation.
I think I was left with the thought the movie was trying to
arouse questions about the truthfulness of the gospel being
preached or bring missionaries to a worldly level, rather
than what is more typical with continuous increase of
testimony and determination to teach the true.
If a missionary want to go home without authorization and
the companion is aware of it the mission president would
certainly be involved. However, there was no involvement
or effort shown by the mission president mission
president.
I think the most offensive thing, however, was the
flaunting of sacred ordinances. I was extremely
uncomfortable with what was done.
If the intent of the movie was to bring God's Army of
missionaries to be viewed in a more worldly manner, then I
believe the production of this move reached it's goal.
There are several other things that I thought was not
handled appropriately. Displaying dirty linen certainly
doesn't build any positives in my mind.
I would not recommend this movied to anyone, not even for
curiosities sake. I give it two thumbs down for
desireability.
JORDAN | Apr. 24, 2000
I thought it was amazing! I am encouraged to serve a
mission after seeing this movie. I felt the spirit durring
the movie, and if I could feel that there, I think i could
reallt feel it in the field.
SHAWN HOLLENBECK | Apr. 23, 2000
I had never heard anything about this movie and only came
across it in a review in the Mesa Tribune that trashed the
movie. I immediatley was curious to learn more about it as
I read the description of what the film was about. I found
the website on the film which only peaked my curiosity even
more. After seeing it, I have nothing but praise for this
excellent movie portraying the missionary life in such a
way, that it will strike a chord with EVERY missionary who
has ever served. I have been home for almost 10 years and I
tell you, I was literally taken back into the field... it
felt SO real. I cannot recommend this movie enough, I have
thought about it for days on end, I have told literally
everyone I know, LDS or not, that they must see this movie.
I tell you it was strange to feel the spirit in a movie
theatre of all places, I only hope that more films like
this can be made.
[NOT NECESSARY] | Apr. 23, 2000
I think God's Army was a great film. I'm not saying that
God's Army is my favorite movie of all time, I'm just
saying I liked it.
EMILY JOHNSON | Apr. 22, 2000
I thought this movie was an excellent example that movies
can have a heavy message and still be funny and sad. I
thought it also was extremely well made for not having a
major movie behind it. I want to thank the people who made
this movie!! I love ya guys! T.C.I.T!!
KEOLA CIRIAKO | Apr. 22, 2000
I really enjoyed the movie and the message it carried
spiritually and temporally. It made me laugh, feel
emotional, and comfortable. It didn't have to rely on
violence or "X rated" scenes to hold my attention. The
plot touched on real situations these dedicated men and
women go through while on a mission. Each enter the
mission from different walks of life, cultures, childhood
upbringing, two or single parent homes, and financial
standing ranging from high to poverty level. Many carry
burdens but find the load getting lighter as they serve
their God by helping others. Had I seen this movie prior
to being converted, I probably wouldn't rate it so high.
However, after being through the grinds of life, seeking
answers, and learning what missionary service is all about,
it changed my views. Good Job!!!
ANONYMOUS | Apr. 19, 2000
As a non-LDS Christian, I was really impressed with this
film. This movie gave me my first glimpse into LDS
missionary life and I'm truly grateful for it. The film
showed me real people struggling with real problems with
love, grace and surprisingly, a strong dose of humor!
Honestly, I was expecting something kind of hokey with
really bad acting. I was engrossed by the strong story
line and the quality of the acting was 'Wow! Amazing!'. The
music is wonderful too.
This film is great for people who want to see a good movie,
and are tired of senseless violence and nudity. If you care
about God's activities among us, then you'll really love
this movie. Thank you a million times for lifting up the
curtain just a little bit with such a fantastic film. I
hope the LDS population stops worrying about negative
backlash (impossible, there's nothing negative about your
faith in the movie at all) and starts supporting this film.
JP POTTER | Apr. 19, 2000
This movie sucked.
JULIE | Apr. 19, 2000
I agree with most everybody here. I loved God's Army. I am
a convert to the Church, and though I have not served a
mission, I felt like I was part of the movie, because I was
reminded of the elders who shared the gospel with me. They
were fun, and commited, and when they bore their
testimonies to me, I knew it was true. I'm glad they
weren't out judging people, or they might have overlooked
me. I guess other people can hate this movie if they want,
I didn't like "Rocky", and people still give me a hard time
about that. But I don't think that this movie makes
missionaries look mediocre, I think it makes them look
outstanding. My husband served a mission, and I watched him
smile, or get choked up at many parts. He whispered to me
that prostitutes in his mission used to look for the
missionaries to bless their children. I wonder if any of
them every joined the church? Surely they were blessed if
the missionaries treated them as a servant of the Lord
should. I wonder how hard it would be for a missionary in
L.A to totally avoid all the worldly and wild sights there?
I hope those missionaries are grown up enough to deal with
it. Technically, we think that anybody could love this
movie. We bought the sound track and have just about worn
it out. We hope this movie has success outside of Utah. I
was worried about people who think this movie is evil, but
then I realized that there are probably arenas where people
who are better than everybody else can get together and pat
each other on the back. But as for me, I HIGHLY RECOMMEND
God's Army, whether or not you've been a missionary, or are
going to be one.
SAM NIELSON | Apr. 17, 2000
I saw the movie "God's Army" with a bunch of friends a
few
weeks ago, and all that I can say is that it was one of the
worst movies ever made! Is it right to show missionaries
being disrespectful to each other as well as the Lord,
breaking mission rules, and in general striving only for
mediocrity? Was it right to show a missionary placing salt
into a fellow Elder's cereal while the prayer was being
said? Is it for the missionaries to take pictures of each
other while they are on the toilet? The answer to both of
these questions is NO WAY!! These acts show a complete
lack
of respect for the Lord and his work.
Some may argue that stuff like that really happens on
missions, so it is necessary to show that in the film. That
argument is completely unfounded! I spent two weeks in
missionary apartments in Taiwan with the missionaries and
each one of them, including the "Greenies," had more
respect
for the work being done than "Pops" did after serving for
almost two years.
I am extrememly dissappointed that Mr. Dutcher chose to
place missionaries in such a mediocre light. The movie
seems to praise those missionaries that don't really care
to
represent Christ as best as they can and only serve
because they were pressured into it by family and friends.
Pops, although he is one of the better missionaries in the
film, is a far cry from what a missionary truly should be.
Resorting to violence to try and convince an elder to
stay in the mission field was wrong. So was taking a route
home that had prostitutes on it. He should have found
another area to walk!
Instead of showing us mediocre missionaries, Mr. Dutcher
should have shown the way most missionaries act and the way
that every missionary should behave.
THIS MOVIE CONTAINS NO VALUE TO PROSPECTIVE MISSIONARIES,
AS IT SHOWS THEM THE WAY NOT TO ACT AND SAYING THAT
MEDIOCRITY IS OKAY!
Sam Nielson
spn5@hotmail.com
BEN | Apr. 17, 2000
There is no way an appropriate review of this movie can be
offered, with any degree of intelligence, without first
seeing the movie. I saw this movie, and I was touched, very
deeply. I felt that spirit of serving the Lord that I felt
when I was a missionary. How can we be so proud of the
young people who choose to dedicate their time to the
service of the Lord, and yet be so afraid of who they are
at the same time? Mr. Dutcher has done a wonderful thing
with this movie, and I offer him my sincere gratitude. I
hope this opens the doors for more work of this kind. My
only suggestion to reviewers is that they see the movie
before attacking it. Unless they've had some kind of
prophetic vision.
TMH | Apr. 17, 2000
I loved it both times I saw it. The people I went with
loved it as well I have not heard of anyone, excpet for that
other guy (holier then thou himself). Pal, you will fill
the spirit and you will enjoy yourself. Give it a try and
if you want pray about it when your done
ELIJAH | Apr. 13, 2000
Hello. I've been home from my mission for four months
now. I have not seen "God's Army" nor will I. I don't
feel it is an appropriate movie. Why?
I'll explain myself this way. From what I've read,
in "God's Army" the "messengers get in the way of the
message". Yes, missionaries are human. But that's not the
point, is it? Missionaries weak though they are are called
to represent God. They are called to represent His
church, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
The church Christ Himself established on earth and presides
over. The only church with His authority to baptize, to
confirm, to bless, and to seal families togethor forever.
Of course people will identify with the characters in
the movie. Can any of us recall a movie in which we didn't
identify with at least one character? In no way am I
trying to be disrespectful, yet I identified with "Rocky"
and "Bambi" though I'm neither boxer nor deer.
My point is a man as talented as Mr. Dutcher could have
used his abilities to focus on The Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter Day Saints, it's doctrines and teachings.
Instead, it seems Mr. Dutcher was intent on proving that
missionaries are human, medocrity is okay, and emotionalism
is an appropriate substitute for spirituality.
--Elijah K. Nielson
ANN | Apr. 10, 2000
God's Army was such a great spiritual booster for me. I'm
wondering what non-members of the church have thought about
this production. Did they like it? Did it help them better
understand what the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints is all about? Or What?
I suppose my favorite parts were when Elder Allen was trying
to find out for himself whether the church was true or not,
and when the elders kept playing practical jokes on
eachother. Hilarious!!!!! And "Samuel the Lamanite". That
part was funny too.
Well, anyway, I definitely recommend seeing this movie. It
doesn't matter who you are. You might like it!
ERAN "SLY DOG" SLY | Apr. 7, 2000
GOD'S ARMY WAS INSPIRTIONAL AND MOVING, A MUST SEE. I
WILL BE INVITING MY WIFE'S NONMEMBER FAMLY TO WATCH THE
MOVIE WITH US. THEY ARE ALWAYS ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT MY
MISSION, AND CALLED TO SERVE DID NOT SUFFICE. I BELIEVE
THIS MOVIE IS QUITE ACCURATE IN IT'S DEPICTION OF A
MISSIONARIES LIFE. THE MOVIE WAS VERY DRAMATIZED, BUT A
MISSIONARIES LIFE IS DRAMATIC SO I BELIEVE IT WAS
APPROPRIATE.
NEPHI M. VOGE | Apr. 2, 2000
My wife and I saw the movie on Thursday. Last night she
went with three of our children. Everyone loved the
movie. Mr. Dutcher took considerable risks with the topic
and at first I was very uncomfortable viewing sacred
material on the big screen. However, as I got obsorbed in
the story and the message of the movie, it became a
powerful experience for me. Perhaps there is nothing more
important in finding your own testimony and using it for
the benefit of others. I encourage both Mormons and non-
Mormons to see it.
MICHAEL KENNARD | Mar. 30, 2000
This is a great movie. It has emotion, suspence, and
humor. It is a great family movie. This is definately the
best movie I've seen at the theaters since "Star Wars:
Episode I" was released.
JENNY | Mar. 29, 2000
My husband and I, along with a small group of friends, saw
God's Army a few weeks ago, and we absolutely loved it.
Everyone in our group was a returned missionary, and we all
agreed that this movie depicted missionary life extremely
well. In fact, my husband and his best friend, who are both
from Brazil and served their missions there, were amazed at
how similar missionary life in L.A. was to that of their
mission experiences in their own country--the same jokes,
the same stereotypes and the same spiritual experiences. I
know this film will cater primarilly to the LDS audience,
but I sure hope there are non-members out there who will
feel inclined to see it, especially those that wonder who
those guys in white shirts and ties are.
TRACY | Mar. 27, 2000
This is the best movie I've seen since Anna and the King. I
encourage everyone to go and see it.
JENNIFER SWENSEN | Mar. 27, 2000
I found this movie very touching and a must see in my
oppinion. I just hope it will open in Las Vegas so the rest
of my friends and family will have the chance to see it.
Make sure you bring kleenex. And my applause to Mr Dutcher
for his work on this film.
HAYDEE DECKER | Mar. 26, 2000
I really, really enjoyed this movie. I laughed, I cried,
and I said 'Amen' a couple of times. I have taken my
family
to this wonderful movie twice and intend on purchasing the
video when it is realesed. I loved the acting. Elder
Allen
did a great job as the 'Greeny'. The cast made the movie
really seem very real. Like I said above, I joined the
'Amen' at the end of the prayers and I heard an echo
through
the theater which told me others joined in too. I highly
recommend this movie to all LDS and non-LDS that want to
know what the Mormons do for two years around the world!
Thank you for such a great movie! Let's see the Book of
Mormon on the wide screen!
STEVE LAJEUNESSE | Mar. 25, 2000
Having grown up in the Mormon faith, and having seen nearly
every film produced by the Church, this movie took me by
suprise as it really looked and felt like a real HollyWood
production. I too, like others who've commented, served a
mission, and while it was seemingly imposible that all of
those personalities could exist in one missionary pad, it
was so true that those personalities do exist in every
mission to some extent, usually more spread out. The
experiences were quite true, missionaries are real people
from the real world and struggle to do the best they can.
It did take a little while to feel comfotable through some
of the more sacred moments. But how else could you portray
these events as anything less than real? Could non-members
enjoy this movie? I hope that they can! In final, I like
better having this movie portray missionary life than say
a Gods Maker type movie. Truth is so much better than a
bitter fiction.
MARK LAROCCO | Mar. 24, 2000
This is a surprisingly professional movie, worthy of high
accolades for its boldness, accuracy, and entertainment
value. Although the movie features many more tragic and
pivotal events than typically happen to one missionary,
integrity is not lost to marketability. A movie made with
less dramatic events and more of a documentary style (which
is what I was expecting) would have just been boring
compared to what I saw. The movie's great secret: it is
astonishingly funny! I didn't feel that I had to courtesy
laugh at all. The tender blend of humor and sentimentality
gives this film character that I haven't seen since "Life
is Beautiful". Kudos to creator Richard Dutcher. I give
it 3 1/2 stars. Thank you.
Mark LaRocco of Providence, Utah
MOLLY | Mar. 24, 2000
I went last night with my family and I took my seven year
old son. We all loved it. My brother is serving a mission
in Albania and we loved watching a movie about LDS
missionaries. I hope that we see more from Richard, he did
a wonderful job. My son loved the bathroom pictures, he
couldn't stop laughing. It was GREAT!!! I hope non-members
will give it a chance.
STEPHANIE CARVER | Mar. 22, 2000
I thought the movie was so GOOD! I encourage everybody to
go see it. It was such a good movie I saw it five times!
You should too!
PAUL TAYLOR | Mar. 20, 2000
I wish I could take every nonmember I know to see this
movie.
As a believing and missionary-minded member, I wasn't too
concerned about what this movie would say about Mormons or
our faith. Our faith will stand on its own merits, however
movies portray it. I was more concerned about what the
'God's Army' would say about its writer, director, producer
and co-star, Richard Dutcher.
What the film said to me about Richard Dutcher leaves me
rejoicing. It convinced me that:
1) Dutcher is humble. This film doesn't try to say anything
about its creator. He doesn't even flirt with the tactic,
so
common among artists, of making yourself look big by
lessening something much bigger than you. He certainly had
the opportunity, making a film about something as big as
his
own faith.
2) Dutcher is honest. His portrayal of missionaries and
missionary life rang so true that I came away not just
understanding, but feeling understood. This film doesn't
hide and it doesn't sell, it just tells the truth.
3) Dutcher is faithful. This is the quality that makes me
want to sing about this movie. Dutcher can afford to be
honest, because he honestly believes that his subject
matter
can stand on its own, without his adding lipgloss or
covering blemishes. He believes he can show missionaries
just as they are, weak and powerful, doubting and firm,
irreverent and solemn, happy and sad, imperfect and heroic,
and the Church will be okay. It works, because the Church
IS
true, and Dutcher knows it. In fact, he counts on it.
I want nonmembers to see this movie because humility,
honesty and faith invite the Spirit, and as Dutcher said
through Elder Dalton, it is the Spirit that converts.
RON HARMER | Mar. 20, 2000
God's Army is wonderful!!! If you have served an LDS
mission, have a child that has served a mission, someday
plan on serving a mission or wonder what these mormon
missionaries do - it is an absolute must see. This movie
hit me directly in the heart more than any movie I've seen
in regular theaters. It stands alone as the ONLY realistic
portrait of real live missionaries. GO SEE IT! GO SEE
IT! GO SEE IT!
LEONE GILLESPIE | Mar. 20, 2000
I think this movie was great. It was funny, spiritual and
uplifting. The director did a great job in directing and
acting in it. I hope this film opens around the country.
KAY | Mar. 19, 2000
Terrific movie! As a Mormon, I have had many of the doubts
and concerns that were depicted in this film. I saw and
felt very real emotions in myself and others as I sat in
that theatre. This movie has haunted me for days...
I recently sent my two sons on missions and enjoyed seeing
some of the day-to-day "stuff" that goes on during the
missionary experience...and I believe that this story
sensitively shows how many earnest young men and women
struggle, pray for, and find true faith in Jesus Christ and
the Gospel.
I was also impressed with the tasteful depictions of things
we hold very personal and sacred---a difficult task for Mr.
Dutcher--but he did it well. It feels good to finally see a
movie that is honest about who and what we are...a people
who are not perfect by any means, but who have respect for
others, a deep faith in Christ, and a desire to share that
faith and the joy that it brings. Highly recommended.
JOHN FORBES | Mar. 19, 2000
The movie was well done and authentic. It portrayed some of
the mental struggles missionaries have very realistically.
Yes, the last third might have been sentimental and
cliched,
but sometimes truth is stranger than fiction and having had
a brother that died in the mission field of Hodgkins
disease, similar to "Pops" these things do happen.
JEREMY SOUTH | Mar. 18, 2000
I was very sceptical going in to see this film, especially
at the beginning when the Mission President seemed so
heartless toward the young Elder Allen. I'll admit,
however, that as the movie progressed and the experiences
portrayed were almost identical to my own in the
missionfield, I had a change of heart. I really felt the
emotional rollercoaster that Elder Allen was on. I went
through the exact same thing. I feel this movie showed a
missionaries life very well and would recommend it to any
of
my friends or acqua
BRENT | Mar. 18, 2000
I loved this movie! I've read other comments, and I agree
with most of them. I think this movie helps Mormon people
get a hold of what really happens out in the mission feild.
My mission was a beautiful, spiritual time, and God's Army
was so real for me, that I felt like I was back out there
again. I don't think that you have to be a Mormon to really
enjoy this show, I recommend it for everyone. As for LDS
people who are uncomfortable with it, well, some of them
make think they had a more pious experience, but I don't
believe them. And if they haven't served in the mission
feild, then this movie lets them peek in on what mission
life is really like. If their vision was different, it's
time to take some inventory on our beliefs and get a firmer
grip on what's really true. We all owe a huge debt of
gratitude to Richard Dutcher for telling a wonderful story
in a touching and beautiful way. Richard's story is a huge
success story.
RUSS DUNCAN | Mar. 18, 2000
Great Movie. Close to 4 stars for me. Acting is
surprisingly wonderful. I had a companion that was 25, and
a convert. He was intense, wouldn't lighten up, and we
struggled a bit. We worked it out, leaning much from each
other. This movie triggered many nuerological anchors
relating to the mission experience, particualarly of
psycolocical challenges, and of the great love you gain for
the people, companions, and for the work.
JOSEPH ALLRED | Mar. 17, 2000
I thought that the movie was well done for the mormon
audience. I am just wondering if that was the intended
audience or was the intention to spark the interest of any
nonmemebers. I wouldn't recommend any support for this
film. I feel that it destracts from the sacred calling of
being called to serve for our Heavenly Father. I feel that
it could be easy for any nonmember to get the wrong opinion
about our beliefs and what missionaries really do or SHOULD
do on missions.
TRENT THORNTON | Mar. 16, 2000
I think people put too much thought in analyzing this
movie. It was really good, and I would like all of my non-
mormon friends to see it. I liked it because it's
realistic and I felt the Spirit. When Elder Allan
struggled with his testimony I felt exactly what he was
feeling because I went through the same thing. I could
relate. Great Job.
DONALD B. GUNDERSON | Mar. 15, 2000
Excellent. Well acted. Cute sense of humor. The plot
contains more stuff than would probably happen on one
single mission, but it is stuff that happens all the time
to missionaries generally, and the feeling of the movie is
accurate and authentic. It's too bad that non-LDS viewers
will probably think it is hokey, but any person with an
honest curiosity about missionary life could benefit from
this film.
CHAD A. STROMAN | Mar. 13, 2000
Saw this movie on Friday. What caught me by surprise was
that I had been toying the last couple of years with the
idea of writting a screenplay about missionaries and had
written down tons of notes and scenes that came into my
mind
and was finally getting to the point of organizing them
into
a coherent story with plot lines when to what to my
wondering eyes should appear? But a movie already produced
about the very subject matter that I had been thinking
about. Oh well C?est la vie, at least in my life it?s been
that way, every good idea I have had I have hesitated while
weighing the very shaky but possible desired outcomes with
the more probable outcomes for risking it all, in the which
time someone else beats me to the punch. This movie
re-ignited in me my interest in movie making and the
possibillity, albeit remote, that I could actually realize
my writing and directing ambitions as an active Latter-day
Saint. I went into this movie expecting low-budget, cheesy
acting and either an anti-mormon twist or an "Elder Smith?s
Perfect Adventures in Happy Valley". Well I was wrong. It
was very well balanced between the two. It?s spiritual
moments weren?t church video outakes, and it?s humor wasn?t
vulgar or detractional to the image that the church strives
for. I liked that the Missionaries portrayed in the film
were presented as 19-22 year old Human Beings and not
Gospel
Superman made of steel, but at the same time showing us the
hardships, rigors, and sacrifices of Missionary life. Yes,
there were scenes where I felt that emotions were trying to
be evoked from the audience, but just didn?t quite get the
reaction it seemed to be searching for. Probably because of
the absence or a soundtrack accompanyment at those
times. (I am a big fan of the right mood music at the right
time for the desired effect), but nothing was too
complicated during the story. If anything it had parts that
may have been too simple, but that was what was intended. A
simple but sufficently ample overview of an LDS mission. I
would however place an age of at least teens or higher not
because of content, but because most of the dialogue, jokes
and plots do require some thought but not much. 10 and up
just because I think most children younger than that would
be bored. But for anyone with any interest in current
Mormonism and Mormon culture it is a must see.
DENNIS ORGILL | Mar. 13, 2000
This film is a bit of a miracle. It is a high quality,
genuinely sympathetic movie about LDS Missionary work. In
that alone it is quite astounding. The fact that it treats
matter-of-factly such things as missionaries having doubts,
joking around, arguing, praying together and giving
Priesthood blessings is even more amazing. I am sure that
many things in it will ring true to nearly every returned
missionary, but some things do not--unless things have
changed a great deal since my own mission. For instance, I
never saw such a loosely supervised group of Elders and
Sisters. It looked as though they were almost completely
out of touch with their mission leaders, even in the
drastic cases of missionaries deserting the missionfield,
having siezures, and even dying! They never took their
investigators near a meetinghouse or baptismal font. I
also found it a bit surprising to see missionaries
portrayed as traveling alone, calling each other by their
first names, and not shaking hands when they meet. In my
experience, this almost never happens. I also felt there
was too much pensive soul-searching and not enough
enthusiastic and happy activity. Few missionaries that I
have met are that lethargic or uninvolved. Those
criticisms aside, I found the film moving, touching, and
even inspiring. I recommend it to anyone, though I doubt
that it will find a large audience among non-LDS moviegoers.
WILLY CHASE | Mar. 13, 2000
I had anticipated the movie since I saw a reveiw on the
news about it over a month ago. I also was eager to see it
because while serving a mission I thought it would be neat
to have a movie that REALLY showed missionary life. I was
pleased with what I saw. The pranks are true and
universal, and so are the spiritual experiences. This
movie doen't apologize for anything. It just tells the
story. Probably the only flaw was the light depiction of
the missionary's death. There seemed to be a lack of
emotion from the characters until after what I assume was
the funeral service. And we don't even see the mission
president's involvement until the morgue scence. I have a
feeling a mission president would have been a bit more
involved. But it really doesn't take too much away from
the film. I was deeply touch with this film's honesty, and
I hope to see more like it.
ROBIE CAGLE | Mar. 13, 2000
I am a returned missionary. Though I served in
Australia, much of the films substance is extremely
accurate. I found this film to be entertaining, fun, and
spiritual, with an underlying theme which states,
indirectly, that we all must find out for ourselves what
the
truths of the gospel are, pray concerning them, and be
willing to accept and to act on what we receive in answer
to
those queries.
Sorry, i'm notorious for run on sentences. Yes some
short cuts in production methodology may have occurred,
however, this film does uplift the spirit. It tells our
story, the struggles that our missionaries go through. The
triumphs, the failures, and the personal growth obtained
from missionary service. Honestly, I feel everyone ought
to
at least see this film as much may be gained from doing so.
DANNY OMAN | Mar. 12, 2000
This was a very good movie! I was actually nervous about
seeing it because I wasn't sure what it would be about. I
came out feeling good about it. This is the first movie of
it's kind, and is an example for other films to follow. It
was clean and had a solid message. It proves that sex,
nudity, violence, and profanity are NOT the elements of a
good movie.
ROB SORENSE | Mar. 12, 2000
I recommend this movie highly and did so this morning in
elders quorum meeting. One person made the comment they
heard of two seminary teachers that walk out in the middle.
My comment was they walked out in the middle they missed a
very very good movie. By the way, my parents whom served
two mission loved it also. A must see for all members. I
would, however, be interested in what a non-mormon thought
of it.
DON OLSEN | Mar. 12, 2000
I was hesitant about how sacred aspects of missionary work
would be presented. Having seen the movie I felt they were
treated respectfully and with tact. It was a little
surreal
to see blessings and sacred moments portrayed in a movie .
.
.but they were characteristic of the movie's general
accuracy and honesty.
KEITH WILSON | Mar. 11, 2000
What a strange experience.....a movie that blended the
healing power of the priesthood, with a real life view of
the everyday life of a missionary.....for the whole world
to
see. Wow, I came out of there thinking when is the next
one
going to be released?
This movie blended the most personal intimate details of
everyday missionary life, even items that most would
consider private, yet it was shown in a way that grabs you,
it keeps you rivoted to the screen for the full two hours.
This movie was excellent. Remember Saturday's Warrior?
Well
God's Army is done professionally, it is a movie that has
great sound, and video quality.
Excellent. Rivoting. Spiritual. Funny.
Thank you.
Keith Wilson
Springville
PERRY | Mar. 11, 2000
If you've ever tried to explain to somebody who hasn't
served a mission, what a mission is really like - send them
to this film and say no more.
DARRELL MANGUM | Mar. 11, 2000
I got to see this movie on Wednesday, and it was wonderful.
This movie succeeds in capturing the experience of anyone
who ever served a mission. But it goes farther and strikes
a chord with all people who see it. Fantastic movie.
HEIDI | Mar. 11, 2000
Excellent movie!!!!! Very inspirational....I'm an inactive
LDS & this movie really touched me. Great job!
CHRIS CANO | Mar. 11, 2000
I have to give this movie credit where credit is due. This
movie was amazing, so true to the mission experience. Even
though this wasn't my mission, it was the same. The
experiences the trials the thoughts, they were all the
same, just different place. I don't think I've been
touched so deeply by any movie before. This was real life
for me and it brought all the emotions and good feelings of
every spiritual experience that I ever had on my mission.
This is a movie that is a must to see, especially for
anyone that has served a mission, whether successfull or
not. Job well done!!
ZACH HOSKINS | Mar. 11, 2000
My wife and I went to see God's Army with some trepidation.
I was more then a little concerned by the potential for a
filmmaker to make an insensitive and dishonest portrayal of
what is at its core a sacred experience. On the other hand
I want to be supportive of this type of filmmaking(geared
toward an LDS audience) since I believe it is long overdue,
and I would hate to see a glossed over-never had any
problems account of missionary life. The director did a
great job of balancing the highs of missionary work with
the lows, and the added element of silliness that will
attend any gathering of young men. I identified strongly
with each character onscreen and could give you the names
of the people I met and interacted with on my mission that
Dutcher apparently studied to create these personas. In
fact I now suspect Dutcher of having followed me my whole
mission to garner his material:) Or perhaps he just used
elements that are common to most if not all missionaries.
The acting was far better then I would have expected for a
low budget film. After the movie, several of the main
actors from the film were signing autographs and I asked
them how it was that the cast(which was largely not LDS)
was able to capture every nuance, every emotion so
perfectly without having a mission experience themselves.
It was Michael Buster(Elder Kinegar) who
responded "spirituality is universal". I guess in some ways
we aren't so unique. This film though is, take your family
to see it, it's worth every penny.
DEVIN THORPE | Mar. 10, 2000
This movie was excellent, deserves to be viewed broadly.
It should appeal to non-LDS audiences, but certainly
strikes a chord with LDS viewers. The representation of
mission life is spot on, as evidenced by the cockroach
collection.
BRINTON WILKINS | Mar. 10, 2000
As a movie critic for BYU's newspaper, "The Daily
Universe," I was able to attend a screening of this film in
mid-January. Sitting in the theater with two other critics,
I was consistently and deeply impressed by the honesty and
power of this film.
Admittedly, there are weaknesses. The film could benefit
from a new ending. The "Where-are-they-now" vignettes are
sappy -- especially the cocoa-sipping scene with Elder
Allen
and Sister Fronk.
For those worried that this movie is going to, once
again,
ridicule their faith, take my advice: calm down. The
theology is handled tactfully and sympathetically.
Difficult
questions are raised, but they are common questions that
every member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints eventually grapples with. And the theology of the
Church is NEVER shown in a negative light.
There is a sense of reality in this film that returned
missionaries will find uncanny. Missionary pranks, juvenile
and un-Christlike as they are, are shown. Weak faith,
deteriorating faith and faith-challenging questions are
presented unapologetically.
Those who find this portrayal disturbing most likely do
not understand the "little-boy" syndrome that plagues most
every 19-year-old male "representative of Jesus Christ"
when
they have a few minutes of spare time.
Yes, real-life missionaries do dumb things. Speaking from
my own experience as a missionary in Stockholm, Sweden, I
recognized everything the missionaries in the movie did.
They aren't perfect. They're human. They flirt with
girls.
They read anti-Mormon literature. And then they administer
blessings. They aren't all Captain Moronis. But they're
good
people.
What's important, and this is what is portrayed in the
film, is that they are all trying to become better.
It is in this that the movie finds its strength. There
are
those, especially here at BYU, who may find this picture
less-than-ideal.
So be it.
That's the way it is.
Arguments such as, "This film is like 'casting pearls
before swine,'" and "This denegrates the holy nature of a
mission," are examples of the mindset that Richard Dutcher
is hoping to reduce.
If members of the LDS church are unwilling to show
themselves as imperfect, struggling humans, the stereotype
that they are a fanatic group of secretive liars will be
long in dissipating.
In short: Force paranoia into submission and go see this
movie.
Add your comment
Words Remaining
New Movie Trailers
Top Box Office
| 1. | Marley & Me | $24,263,763.00 |
| 2. | Bedtime Stories | $20,501,339.00 |
| 3. | The Curious Case of Benjamin Button | $18,691,248.00 |
| 4. | Valkyrie | $14,094,617.00 |
| 5. | Yes Man | $13,910,477.00 |
| 6. | Seven Pounds | $10,068,518.00 |
| 7. | The Tale of Despereaux | $6,939,295.00 |
| 8. | The Day the Earth Stood Still | $5,049,648.00 |
| 9. | Doubt | $5,000,893.00 |
| 10. | Slumdog Millionaire | $4,690,769.00 |

