Reader comments
Perspectives on the news:
Health care hardball
March 8, 2010 at 5:11 p.m. | 16 comments
Blog archive
In Blogs
Across Site
- Blog: Bad news for BYU? 11:59 a.m.
- Blog: Rick Hess on No Child Left... 10:25 a.m.
- Blog: C-USA/MWC merger would leave... 9:10 a.m.
- Blog: Two simple Valentine's... 10:12 p.m.
- Blog: Another book on international... 12:59 p.m.
- Blog: In Defense of Goodness 11:59 a.m.
- Blog: An update on revising No Child... 9:49 a.m.
- Blog: Is stomping opponents OK? 6:24 a.m.
- Blog: My make-believe job 9:25 a.m.
- Blog: Another bite at Utah teaching... 9:20 a.m.
In Blogs
Across Site
- Two simple Valentine's traditions...
- A Valentine's tradition your family...
- C-USA/MWC merger would leave USU in cold
- Bad news for BYU?
- Another book on international parenting
- A mother's heart
- Is stomping opponents OK?
- Mitt Romney hates the poor? Careful,...
- Roger Clyne & The Peacemakers in Mexico
- An update on revising No Child Left...
In Blogs
Across Site
Senators Orrin Hatch and Bob Bennett debunked this conspiratorial fantasy. The Salt Lake Tribune “laughed the … suggestion off the table.”
President Obama must have selected Scott Matheson a long time ago, because every judicial nominee announcement is preceded by months of FBI and American Bar Association vetting.
Paul Cassell, a very conservative former Utah U.S. District Judge appointed by President George W. Bush wrote: “Given that the ABA was evaluating Scott in roughly January, one would expect an announcement roughly six weeks later — exactly as happened here. … Unfortunately for conspiracy theorists, the facts show that the Scott Matheson nomination has nothing to with the health care debate.”
[Since 2001 I have headed the environmental community's Judging the Environment project which focuses on federal judicial nominations.]
-Glenn Sugameli
Staff Attorney
Judging the Environment
www.judgingtheenvironment.org
Each of these countries has a health care program for ALL of its people.
The United States of America has as many of its citizens uninsured and ineligible for health care as the total of the populations of ALL of these countries COMBINED.
We should be ashamed of ourselves! And we should support the passage of a health care package for ALL Americans.
Even if the best we can do is to pass the same health care plan EVERY CONGRESSMAN AND SENATOR HAS!
f these hypocrites are so opposed to universal health care coverage let's see them opt out of the one they have.
Let's try to emerge as a first world country and take care of our own!
Holland: Population 16 million
Norway: Population 5 million
Denmark: Population 5.5 million
Belgium: Population 11 million
Finland: Population 5 million
United States of America: Population 300 million
Your math is correct; however, it works against you.
It is unfeasible and unaffordable to provide universal health care for 300 million people, especially when only HALF of them actually pay taxes for it!
At least the public would be helped instead of the politicians....
The brain of a country cannot function long without a heart!
We make more per capita than most, if not all, of those countries, and yet they all have a better standard of living than we do--primarily due to the health care issue.
We have the resources. We just lack the brains and the political will.
I suggest you read the Federalist Papers. Government is better when it is closer to the people. It is very questionable whether the Federal Government even has the power to administer health care. It seems to me that would be a power reserved to the states (Please see the 10th Amendment).
Would it be so bad for those who support health care reform to at least work this out in the states? Why does this have to be a federal issue?
mmmm....who basically underwrites the national defense of these Countries?The USA. Who is going to provide for our national defense when all Federal tax revenue goes to pay for healthcare and interest on national debt? Canada?Mexico?
Look at history and the previous vote counts. Medicare Act of 1965. Vote count Senate Democrats in favor: 57 Republicans in favor: 13. House Democrats in favor: 237 Republicans in favor: 70. 1935 Social Security Act. Vote count Senate Democrats in favor: 60. Republicans in favor: 16. House Democrats in favor: 237 Republicans: 70.
The gridlock that is going on in D.C. is ridiculous. Wake up Utah don’t just rubberstamp no because it is lead by a Democrat. Your Medicare and Social Security bills were lead by Democrats.
Sincerely,
A former Republican disgusted with his once beloved party.