Would the world be more moral without God and religion? That may be what Richard Dawkins and other anti-religion activists argue. But today on Real Clear Politics, Dennis Prager published an article that shows "(t)his argument is so wrong — both rationally and empirically — that its appeal can only be explained by a) a desire to believe it and b) an ignorance of history."
Prager concludes that "Dawkins and his supporters have a right to their atheism. They do not have a right to intellectual dishonesty about atheism."
Copyright 2015, Deseret News Publishing Company