With or without separation of church and state, the state’s interest in marriage has never been about individual rights and privileges. It was about the most sacred of responsibilities. And governments of all kinds wisely chose to protect the family as the creator and incubator of future generations by promoting the fully committed union of a man and a woman. Gender and gender differences matter, especially to children. Mothers and fathers are not interchangeable, which is why changing the definition of marriage is like trying to change the chemical composition of water. It may seem more egalitarian, diverse or tolerant, but it won’t be life-sustaining H2O.
- In our opinion: National security and the...
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms of...
- My view: hippies, 2 Hell's Angels, one...
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment delusion
- Is it time for our first woman president?
- Jay Evensen: On Second Thought: The 1 percent...
- My view: They run toward danger
- Radon, the unrecognized killer
- In our opinion: National security and... 65
- Is it time for our first woman president? 55
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 39
- Letter: Hillary and FOIA 18
- Letter: No labels in 2016? 17
- In our opinion: The lesson of... 17
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment... 14
- Arthur Cyr: US presidential politics... 13