Quantcast

Teeples: The Big 12 simply can't afford to add BYU

By Ryan Teeples

For the Deseret News

Published: Wednesday, July 30 2014 2:00 p.m. MDT

Updated: Wednesday, July 30 2014 5:40 p.m. MDT

Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby speaks at the opening of the NCAA college Big 12 Conference football media days in Dallas, Monday, July 21, 2014. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

LM Otero, AP

Yesterday marked the end of the football media day frenzy that’s gripped America for the past few weeks. While these events are fun, they typically result in little more than copious media fodder and an overdose of coach-speak and pigskin platitudes.

But BYU fans have watched with keen interest as their school’s name has been mentioned in nearly every conference’s event. As recently as Monday at AAC Media Days, Commissioner Mike Aresco brought up the Cougars relative to his league.

"Three of our schools will be playing BYU this year, who we absolutely consider a power team and that will continue moving forward." Aresco said.

While people in Provo probably find the AAC gesture nice, they’re far more interested in what the Big 12 thinks about their program. The 10-team conference held its media days July 21-22, and there was no shortage of pontification from fans and media about the conference’s need to expand and consider BYU its top choice.

The Deseret News used the occasion to put together interesting articles and charts showing how the Cougars stack up against current Big-12 membership. One media outlet, CFB Matrix, even went so far as to include BYU in its Big-12 preview.

But for all that excitement, the Big 12 showed little enthusiasm for expansion. While Commissioner Bob Bowlsby spoke of significant changes yet to come in college football, the collective sentiment of the event in regards to any need for expansion was “No thanks. We’re good.”

Everyone else is expanding, why not the Big 12?

However, not a single media outlet seems to understand exactly why the Big 12 isn’t interested in expansion. Most simply state that the more the conference grows, the more it would have to share its TV revenue, and they imply that’s all there is to it.

Why, then, did the Big Ten, SEC, Pac-12 and ACC expand while the Big 12 stood pat?

It all boils down to the TV revenue model. Conferences can make money televising their product in three distinct categories. First, they sign lucrative contracts with ESPN, ABC, CBS, and Fox to air their top matchups. These are called Tier 1 games. For example, when LSU and Wisconsin play Saturday, Aug. 30, the game will be on prime time on ESPN.

Next, conferences offer rights to Tier 2 games, which are typically shown on lesser but still “national” sports networks. They get significantly lower ratings than the tier 1 games and are often on channels that deliver limited exposure like Fox Sports 1.

Finally, what’s left is considered Tier 3 programming. Conferences typically retain the rights to these games for themselves. Here’s where it gets confusing and where a general lack of understanding exists in the sports landscape.

Tier 3 rights are at the core of expansion — or stagnation

The SEC, Big Ten, Pac-12 and SEC all have their own conference athletics TV networks, built for the purpose of broadcasting Tier 3 games. The Big 12 and ACC do not. Odd as it sounds, the college football expansion insanity is driven primarily by these lower-tier TV games.

The ACC is in a sticky situation because they — probably foolishly — included those lucrative Tier 3 rights in their TV deal with ESPN. While the ACC is rumored to be working on a conference network with ESPN, it may be for sheer survival, as will become clear later.

The Big 12 gives its Tier 3 rights to member schools. Back when it looked like the Pac-10 was going to pilfer Texas and Oklahoma, the conference agreed to let Texas build the Longhorn Network, leaving it almost impossible to make a Tier 3 conference network marketable.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS