Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: What Gov. Herbert's 'non-announcement' means for Utah politics
Brian Nicholson, Deseret News Archives
Last month, Gov. Gary Herbert invited a number of business leaders and politicos to breakfast and revealed he intends to seek re-election in 2016. The governor, along with Lt. Gov. Spencer Cox, made it clear it was not a formal campaign announcement. But the event raises a number of interesting questions.
If Herbert is running, why didn’t he just announce it and start campaigning? Why choose an unusual forum to release this news?
Pignanelli: “It is a great act of cleverness to be able to conceal one's being clever.” — Francois Rochefoucauld As a "political insider" who attended, I too was initially confused as to the purpose of the event. Eventually, this dullard realized the informal breakfast strategy was a very shrewd maneuver. By postponing a formal announcement until next year, the governor and his staff are not burdened with the baggage normally associated with a campaign. Yet, the world learned of the governor’s intentions anyway because most of the breakfast attendees were obnoxious gossip hounds (especially me) who cherished the opportunity to tell everyone. Also, several seasoned campaign operatives were included, so they could receive the non-subtle message not to stray from the Herbert camp. Beloved businessman and philanthropist Scott Anderson — in his personal appeal for Herbert’s re-election — delivered the coup de grâce. This signaled approval by the establishment of Herbert’s cause. As an added bonus, the "non-announcement announcement" will thwart large donors from considering other candidates.
The governor accomplished his mission without the nuisance of a press conference. Well done.
Webb: It has been widely expected that Herbert will run again, so the announcement was not a big surprise. But by making it official more than two years before the 2016 election, Herbert obviously wanted to dash the hopes and shut down fundraising of potential opponents, and not allow his supporters to stray to other candidates. It was a signal to business and opinion leaders to stick with him because he’s going to be the governor for the next six years.
Utah is leading the country in economic development and favorable business climate. Some polls show Herbert is the most popular governor in the nation. Is there any chance he does not get re-elected in 2016?
Pignanelli: Insiders joke that when two or more Republicans bump into each other on Main Street and start chatting, the governor may join them. This reflects the reality no one has worked harder in the GOP trenches through attending thousands of tiresome events around the state. Herbert has some detractors who grumble he cannot make a decision or push a plan of action. Because no examples of such indecisiveness or poor planning have been articulated, Utahns hold a positive view of Herbert.
Thus barring a major recession or mistake, the governor will enjoy a strong wind at his back through the next election.
Webb: The knock on Herbert is that he is a “caretaker” governor — that he’s a good guy and competent manager, but he’s not a visionary or “big idea” chief executive. He hasn’t done the hard things to attack Utah’s biggest problems like education funding and infrastructure needs, and he hasn’t even provided forceful leadership on energy development and public lands issues. He has ridden Utah’s natural stability, conservatism and pro-business environment that have always produced a solid economy and good quality of life. So he has high approval ratings. But other than holding a lot of summits and organizing numerous commissions and task forces, he hasn’t been a dynamic governor who has pushed the envelope.
There is some truth in those criticisms. But Herbert is a likeable guy, the state is doing well, Utahns are happy, and Herbert will have a ton of money to spend on his campaign. So he’s clearly the odds-on favorite to win.
- Stuart Reid: Despite study results, religion...
- Dan Liljenquist: Utah Retirement System audit...
- My view: Reducing benefits gradually can make...
- National debt not just financial issue...
- Letter: Put people in control
- In Our Opinion: Hatch-Cardin bill to make...
- Richard Davis: The million-dollar question...
- Letter: Beware of barbecued bugs
- Stuart Reid: Despite study results,... 49
- Richard Davis: The million-dollar... 48
- Letter: Solar surcharge 34
- In our opinion: Study cites excessive... 32
- In our opinion: Teacher evaluations a... 30
- Michael Gerson: Republicans should... 30
- My view: Reducing benefits gradually... 28
- Letter: Keep it simple 27