Immigration reform is somewhat misleading because it doesn’t define what the term means.
To some it means amnesty.” To some it means re-doing the statutes and laws. To others it means doing away with all immigration laws completely. It’s interesting that in this particular article it’s the leaders, calling upon other leaders to do something. Should we do something just for the sake of doing anything? Can any person really want amnesty for many illegal aliens in this country right now? Should these people all be given legal status, become wards of the state and given the opportunity to vote?
I call upon leaders to re-think their position and simply call on the Obama administration to enforce existing laws so that our country can remain strong and free, not subject to the whims of those who decide which laws should be enforced and which should be ignored.
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- Can Hollywood keep the faith in faith-based...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Re-enactment...
- Letter: Policy disagreement
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have voted for
- My view: Circuit Court's Obamacare decision...
- Letter: Outdated climate
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 69
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 64
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 61
- In our opinion: History will remember... 46
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and... 46
- Letter: Breeding hate 45
- Letter: Policy disagreement 37
- In our opinion: Use market forces and... 32