Utah athletics has a system in place for NCAA compliance

Published: Sunday, June 29 2014 11:56 p.m. MDT

Updated: Sunday, June 29 2014 11:56 p.m. MDT

Athletics Director Chris Hill talks to the media at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City on Thursday, Aug. 15, 2013.

Kristin Murphy, Deseret News

Enlarge photo»

SALT LAKE CITY — When it comes to NCAA compliance, the University of Utah has a plan in place. Actually, it’s more of a system — and one that athletics director Dr. Chris Hill considers unique.

It’s set up for outside checks and balances by the school's legal department.

Utah compliance has a dotted line to Robert Payne of the office of general counsel, who reports quarterly to university president David W. Pershing. Both Hill and Payne receive compliance notifications.

“So when I speak to the coaches, how many times do you think I want Robert Payne to talk to the president and then have the president call me?” Hill said. “Zero.”

Hill explained that the university president has been independently informed of such things for more than a decade.

Payne isn’t the athletic department’s lawyer. He does, however, offer assistance and advice on NCAA compliance matters as associate general counsel for the U.

The compliance office is required to go over everything with Payne, he noted, and the legal department is good at investigating things, writing up reports and has relationships with national firms that specialize in compliance — offering advice and experts.

“I really like it,” Hill said of the system Utah has in place.

So, too, does Kate Charipar. She directs the compliance office on campus, leading a staff of four other full-time employees. They operate under a compliance pyramid that includes education; establishing and reviewing policies and procedures; monitoring; and enforcement.

“Everything that I have ever needed for this office and asked Chris Hill, or our office of general counsel, or the president for, we’ve been provided with,” Charipar said.

Charipar and her staff, who spend much of their time on rules interpretation and education, write waivers for student-athletes and coaches. The compliance office’s Web site describes their duties as upholding the integrity of the institution by promptly investigating any known or alleged rules violations and self-reporting any infractions that are confirmed.

“We serve as that benevolent force, that helpful person, that advocate that’s fighting on your behalf — that wants you to be able to do what you want to do,” Charipar said. “On the other side, we’re the monitoring force.”

It’s a fine line, she acknowledged, thus the most important part of their duties may very well be relationship building.

Charipar explained that coaches know the compliance office is doing everything they can to help them. There’s nothing personal about self-reporting violations to the NCAA. It’s what they do.

Up to this point, Utah has 22 minor violations through the 2013-14 academic year (which ends July 31). The only one currently awaiting a response from the NCAA has the recommendation for no penalty by both Utah’s compliance office and the Pac-12.

To put Utah’s number of self-reported NCAA violations in context, media reports indicate that Ohio State had 42 in 2013 and that Iowa State and Iowa reported 27 and 24, respectively, in a period from April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2014.

“I’m sure there’s a lot of schools that have the same environment and that atmosphere of compliance, but we’re very, very lucky here that it comes from the president, it comes from Chris Hill,” said Charipar, who noted that it’s very easy to make a mistake because of the complicated NCAA rules. “Let’s just own up to it, get it taken care of. Because when it’s small, it’s small.”

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS