With the World Cup in full swing, I think it would be more beautiful, much simpler, less frustrating and more enjoyable for players and fans alike if the offside rule were eliminated. It has a convoluted definition that is hard to understand, and even harder to enforce. Who can really tell if any part of the player (the nose or a toe, for example) is ahead of the second to last defender at the precise moment the ball is played by a teammate who may be far down the pitch? It requires a subjective judgment call by an official who may not be in a good position to observe the action, who has to closely observe multiple players at once and who must rule almost instantaneously, with little opportunity for review or reversal.
The rule tends to slow the game and depress scoring opportunities, resulting in many draws or very low-scoring games. Finally, it leads to controversy and detracts from the really beautiful aspects of the game. I say boot the offside rule and open up the game.
Salt Lake City
- Jay Evensen: Ask people in the Third World if...
- My view: Medical marijuana: Google vs. PubMed
- In our opinion: Alleged medicinal benefits of...
- Rely on invisible hand?
- George F. Will: Break the dentists' hold on...
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe?
- My view: Does going to pot send the wrong...
- My view: Why so many Americans find Trump and...
- In our opinion: National security and... 79
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 58
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe? 39
- Barack Obama: Religious freedom keeps... 34
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography... 32
- In our opinion: Alleged medicinal... 32
- Letter: Coal and job creation 24
- Rely on invisible hand? 23