Centerville, Murray reject UTOPIA utility fee proposal

Published: Tuesday, June 24 2014 10:30 p.m. MDT

City leaders in Murray and Centerville voted to withdraw from a proposal to hand over control of the UTOPIA fiber-optic network to an Australia-based investment firm.

Jason Olson, Deseret News

Enlarge photo»

MURRAY — In separate votes, the Centerville and Murray city councils Tuesday rejected a proposal to charge residents a monthly utility fee for fiber-optic Internet service.

The two cities join fellow UTOPIA members Lindon and Payson in voting against moving forward to the second of several milestones in a proposal by Australia-based Macquarie Capitol Group.

The proposal calls for Macquarie to complete construction and assume management of the network, including providing basic Internet service in exchange for a utility fee paid by all residents independent of whether they subscribe to service over the network.

Brigham City, Layton, Midvale, Tremonton and West Valley City previously voted to move forward with the Macquarie proposal. The remaining member cities — Orem and Perry — have until Friday to either reject the proposal or agree to explore the potential deal.

"What we’re looking at, really, is whether or not the utility fee model is the right fit," Centerville City Councilman Lawrence Wright said. "We’re expressing an intent that we will go forward with a utility model, and from what I’ve heard and what I’ve read, the majority of the people in our city do not want to go forward with a utility model."

The Utah Telecommunications Open Infrastructure Agency began 12 years ago as a means to bring high-speed Internet, phone and television services to individuals and businesses along the Wasatch Front. But low sign-ups and stalled construction have left the network incomplete, serving a small base of customers and languishing in debt.

The Murray City Council was met with applause from a capacity crowd after unanimously voting against moving forward with the Macquarie proposal.

The council did not hear public comment Tuesday, but Councilwoman Diane Turner said she had received more than 200 emails on the subject, with roughly 80 percent of those messages expressing opposition to a utility fee structure.

Councilman Brett Hales said the city received nearly 1,100 responses to its informal resident surveys on the subject, with 632 residents opposed to the Macquarie plan, 114 undecided and roughly 300 in favor.

Hales also expressed his personal opposition to charging residents an $18 to $20 monthly fee to maintain the fiber-optic network.

"I have never been able to stomach a $240 a year fee whether you use it or not," he said. "It just has never, ever made sense to me."

Councilman Blair Camp commented that no matter what decision the council reached on UTOPIA, council members were likely to be called crazy — "or worse."

Camp said the question before the City Council was whether the Macquarie proposal was in the best interest of Murray, and he added that there were few examples nationwide of communities that had successfully implemented a public fiber-optic network.

"I think what it really boils down to for me and for my constituents is that this is not a proven business model," he said. "My biggest concern is this 30-year commitment that we’ll be locked into as a city."

Camp said he has often heard UTOPIA compared to other public utilities, like garbage collection, as a justification for levying a fee on residents. But he added that those types of city services do not require the same long-term committment UTOPIA cities are facing with Macquarie.

"We would never sign a 30-year contract for a provider of garbage collection," he said.

Councilman Dave Nicponski also suggested that the city erred in the initial creation of the UTOPIA network and would err further by moving forward.

Try out the new DeseretNews.com design!
try beta learn more
Get The Deseret News Everywhere