I have been following Rocky Mountain Power’s proposed $4.25 fee for solar customers, and though I don’t have solar on my roof, I am concerned that this fee will discourage Utahns from investing in this abundant, nonpolluting energy source. I am particularly frustrated by Rocky Mountain Power’s attempt to pit communities against one another under the guise of fairness.
In an interview for Fox13Now.com ("Power company proposes new charge," April 15), Rocky Mountain Power’s Paul Murphy implied that people in Rose Park (referencing non-solar customers I assume), are in some way footing the bill for people in Park City (with solar). I’m a resident of Rose Park, and I know that solar energy is good for all Utahns because it helps to improve Utah’s air quality, promotes energy independence and security, and creates local jobs.
Furthermore, I am grateful to my neighbors in Rose Park, Park City, and beyond that are contributing clean energy to our grid, of which I (and others) benefit from. I may not have solar, but I certainly don’t want those making that investment penalized. Whether we live in Rose Park or Park City, clean energy and clean air are values that bring us together.
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- Can Hollywood keep the faith in faith-based...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Re-enactment...
- Letter: Policy disagreement
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have voted for
- My view: Circuit Court's Obamacare decision...
- Letter: Outdated climate
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 69
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 64
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 61
- In our opinion: History will remember... 46
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and... 46
- Letter: Breeding hate 45
- Letter: Policy disagreement 37
- In our opinion: Use market forces and... 32