Judy Weiss' suggestion that a carbon tax would somehow reduce carbon emissions (“A carbon tax,” April 28) fails a basic logic test. In order to reduce carbon emissions, one must reduce consumption. That means using less, not producing less. Oil companies are not the consumer. They produce what is demanded by the consumer and then would pass the increased costs of the tax on to the consumer. But rebating the collected taxes to consumers would offset the energy increases and provides no incentive for the consumer to reduce consumption.
So who would lose? Probably not investors, because the oil companies would raise prices before they reduce their dividends to their shareholders. Ultimately it comes back to the consumer in the form of higher costs for everything they buy that uses or depends on oil.
All the scheme really does is give the illusion that the government is cracking down on those "evil" big oil companies. It does nothing for carbon emissions.
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography...
- Jay Evensen: Ask people in the Third World if...
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe?
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment delusion
- Jonathan Johnson: The truth about sales tax...
- In our opinion: Critics of porn resolution...
- In our opinion: National security and the...
- Dan Liljenquist: Increasing police officer pay
- In our opinion: National security and... 77
- Is it time for our first woman president? 55
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 55
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe? 35
- Barack Obama: Religious freedom keeps... 33
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography... 31
- Letter: Coal and job creation 23
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment... 19