Judy Weiss' suggestion that a carbon tax would somehow reduce carbon emissions (“A carbon tax,” April 28) fails a basic logic test. In order to reduce carbon emissions, one must reduce consumption. That means using less, not producing less. Oil companies are not the consumer. They produce what is demanded by the consumer and then would pass the increased costs of the tax on to the consumer. But rebating the collected taxes to consumers would offset the energy increases and provides no incentive for the consumer to reduce consumption.
So who would lose? Probably not investors, because the oil companies would raise prices before they reduce their dividends to their shareholders. Ultimately it comes back to the consumer in the form of higher costs for everything they buy that uses or depends on oil.
All the scheme really does is give the illusion that the government is cracking down on those "evil" big oil companies. It does nothing for carbon emissions.
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- Can Hollywood keep the faith in faith-based...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Re-enactment...
- Letter: Policy disagreement
- 10 things you never knew about the FBI
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have voted for
- Letter: Outdated climate
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 69
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 64
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 61
- In our opinion: History will remember... 46
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and... 46
- Letter: Breeding hate 45
- Letter: Policy disagreement 37
- In our opinion: Use market forces and... 32