The "wealth" of a nation is largely dependent upon how efficiently it can produce (or obtain via trade) the food, shelter, and clothing required and desired by its citizenry — transportation, communication and energy being necessary auxilliaries of that production.
Although private sector jobs, by necessity, provide those goods or services needed and desired by the consuming public (such production representing our nation's wealth) government expenditures consume that wealth — sometimes wisely, but often foolishly.
Herein lies the basic error underlying Socialist theory: As governments extend their wealth-consuming tentacles further and further into the private sector (indulging in unending attempts to legislate goodness) — freedom and prosperity fall victim to that process.
Socialism is like salt: a dash here and there is good, but a cupful ruins the product.
- Robert Bennett: Obama has his own 'killer...
- In our opinion: Labor Day revisited
- Drew Clark: Religious freedom is more than a...
- In our opinion: Trouble on tap? Colleges...
- John Hoffmire: Monied interests and democracy
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to inversion is...
- On second thought
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet
- Drew Clark: Religious freedom is more... 46
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet 45
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse... 43
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to... 39
- Letter: Society puzzles 33
- Join the discussion: Is Common Core... 32
- Jay Evensen: Utahns support Common... 31
- Americans are changing their tune on... 27