The "wealth" of a nation is largely dependent upon how efficiently it can produce (or obtain via trade) the food, shelter, and clothing required and desired by its citizenry — transportation, communication and energy being necessary auxilliaries of that production.
Although private sector jobs, by necessity, provide those goods or services needed and desired by the consuming public (such production representing our nation's wealth) government expenditures consume that wealth — sometimes wisely, but often foolishly.
Herein lies the basic error underlying Socialist theory: As governments extend their wealth-consuming tentacles further and further into the private sector (indulging in unending attempts to legislate goodness) — freedom and prosperity fall victim to that process.
Socialism is like salt: a dash here and there is good, but a cupful ruins the product.
- Letter: No labels in 2016?
- In our opinion: Research suggests that...
- John Florez: Businesses should help pay for...
- Letter: Our public lands
- Arthur Cyr: US presidential politics reflects...
- Dan Liljenquist: What we learned from the...
- My view: The solution to Utah's water problems
- My view: Your family stories have the power...
- Richard Davis: Do presidents have to be... 56
- My view: Get insurance out of health care 49
- My view: Obama's veto won't save Obamacare 35
- In our opinion: Attempting to... 32
- My view: 'Death with dignity' and... 27
- In our opinion: Concerned voters a good... 23
- Dan Liljenquist: What we learned from... 19
- Mantua speed trap 17