The proposed transaction between Comcast and Time Warner highlights the vast gap between the world the broadband industry’s critics imagine and the real world in which these companies compete.
Device, app and content companies are capturing most of the benefits created by ISPs. I recently studied two groups of companies — firms that provide the Internet (from AT&T and Verizon down) and those that use it (like Facebook and Google). The Internet giants earn six to eight times the rate of return of ISPs. ISPs must continually improve their networks to keep pace with rapidly growing bandwidth demands while the device and content providers realize the bulk of the value.
So while critics imagine a post-transaction Comcast dominating the market, it’s the content and device providers, not the cable providers, that hold the cards. Content costs drive cable price increases on consumers because your connection is worthless without them.
Comcast has far faster Internet speeds and more consumer offerings than TWC, so their combination will simply amount to a “trade-up” for TWC customers. But more importantly, the transaction will let them compete with Apple, Netflix, Google and the other true giants in the broadband space.
- In our opinion: Utah gun law that canceled...
- Robert Bennett: Former Defense Secretary Leon...
- John Hoffmire: What's the next step in the...
- Greg Bell: Lessons learned form the campaign...
- Letter: Uninformed candidate
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Our frank...
- In our opinion: Where has the family values...
- Letter: Bad calls and no-calls
- In our opinion: Utah gun law that... 134
- Greg Bell: Lessons learned form the... 86
- In our opinion: New conservative war on... 53
- In our opinion: Where has the family... 49
- Letter: What is ‘common good?’ 30
- Charles Krauthammer: We need to... 27
- Robert Bennett: Former Defense... 27
- In our opinion: School reformers should... 25