The proposed transaction between Comcast and Time Warner highlights the vast gap between the world the broadband industry’s critics imagine and the real world in which these companies compete.
Device, app and content companies are capturing most of the benefits created by ISPs. I recently studied two groups of companies — firms that provide the Internet (from AT&T and Verizon down) and those that use it (like Facebook and Google). The Internet giants earn six to eight times the rate of return of ISPs. ISPs must continually improve their networks to keep pace with rapidly growing bandwidth demands while the device and content providers realize the bulk of the value.
So while critics imagine a post-transaction Comcast dominating the market, it’s the content and device providers, not the cable providers, that hold the cards. Content costs drive cable price increases on consumers because your connection is worthless without them.
Comcast has far faster Internet speeds and more consumer offerings than TWC, so their combination will simply amount to a “trade-up” for TWC customers. But more importantly, the transaction will let them compete with Apple, Netflix, Google and the other true giants in the broadband space.
- In our opinion: U.S. needs immigration...
- Letter: Acting on immigration
- How America feels about Mitt Romney right now
- My view: Remembering JFK 51 years later
- Greg Bell: It's time to raise the gas tax
- In our opinion: 70 mph — driving at the...
- Michael Gerson: Obama’s executive order...
- Dan Liljenquist: Obamacare was a rude...
- In our opinion: U.S. needs immigration... 65
- Dan Liljenquist: Obamacare was a rude... 61
- Letter: Growing party divide 53
- Michael Gerson: Obama’s executive... 44
- How America feels about Mitt Romney... 40
- In our opinion: When it comes to... 40
- Letter: Acting on immigration 39
- My view: Global warming needs free market 26