Manu Fernandez, Associated Press
Mozilla, the computer web browser giant, has company policies strongly supporting diversity and inclusiveness. But apparently this embraces only a narrowly defined sort of diversity, and people not willing to conform to groupthink on certain litmus-test issues will be forced to leave.
No one has accused Eich of practicing any sort of discrimination against gay people, nor has he been a vocal opponent of gay marriage in his capacity as CEO. His only “crime," apparently, was to exercise his legal right to participate in California’s democratic processes in support of a traditional policy viewpoint that captured a majority of voters. Not insignificantly, then-candidate Barack Obama held the same position at the time.
That he could lose his job for such a thing is not only shameful, it’s an affront to basic American principles.
It also sends a chilling message to anyone else who might hold opinions that don’t conform to a politically correct creed of conformity. Change your views or your life will be ruined. Joseph McCarthy would be proud.
How bad did it get for Eich? More than 65,000 people signed a petition on a website appropriately named Credo. It contained this ultimatum: “Eich should make an unequivocal statement of support for marriage equality. If he cannot, he should resign.” Anyone who tried to enter the OkCupid dating site was automatically redirected to a letter saying much the same.
Mozilla’s executive chairwoman, Mitchell Baker, said the company didn’t handle the situation well. But she seemed to indicate the company should have moved sooner, not that it should have upheld its now meaningless commitment to diversity.
These are the sorts of tactics normally associated with dictatorships and tyrannical governments. That such things could gain a foothold in the United States is an indication of just how fragile freedom and liberty truly are.
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- 10 things you never knew about the FBI
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- Robert Bennett: Hamas and its financial...
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook for...
- Can Hollywood keep the faith in faith-based...
- Letter: Policy disagreement
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Re-enactment...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 85
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 72
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 61
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and... 49
- In our opinion: History will remember... 46
- Letter: Breeding hate 44
- Letter: Policy disagreement 41
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 34