Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Our brackets are shot, time to focus on political minutiae
Now that our NCAA brackets have blown apart, we can focus on other things, especially political minutiae. Hopefully, our political instincts are better than our basketball knowledge.
The candidate filing deadline has passed. A record number of incumbent Republicans and Democrats lack serious opposition and will cruise to victory. Some political observers and media voices claim that such uncontested races diminish democracy and breed bad government. Is this really a problem?
Pignanelli: " Ah, but it's nice to be the opposition, nice to be a bone in somebody's throat."--Jack Levine Readers beware. Every two years political pundits, ivory tower academics and activists express deep disappointment when the two major parties are not represented in any race. Their list of grave concerns is well-intentioned nonsense. Encouraging hapless souls to place their name on the ballot, to ensure "the seat is not given away” does not preserve our Republic. The actual result is decent citizens becoming embittered when realizing they are sacrificial lambs.
Approximately 10 percent of the Utah's legislative elections in 2014 will be uncontested (the national average is 30 percent). Moreover, most of the reddest and bluest House districts in Utah- where the minority challenger has no chance- are contested. Oftentimes, an election is unopposed by a major party candidate because other contenders are plugged into local civic affairs, and believe the incumbent is a fine public servant or too popular. This is a compliment, not an insult, to democracy. Having fought hand-to-hand combat in several tough elections, I was grateful for the free passes that came my way.
Stout citizens willing to campaign with vigor because they want to serve or promote an alternative approach best serve our democracy. Just placing names on the ballot is pointless and counterproductive.
Webb: In the redistricting process over a number of decades legislators have created many safe Republican and Democratic districts (although it’s impossible not to create quite a few safe GOP districts in Utah). So unless a strong intra-party challenger emerges, most incumbents are safe bets for re-election.
That can actually be a problem for the safe incumbent. A competitive race motivates politicians to reconnect with voters, visiting with them, hearing their issues, and responding to their concerns. Too often, when incumbents face no serious competition election after election, they start to take their voters for granted, lose touch, and think they are forever entitled to the position. That’s when they’re vulnerable. A hard-working challenger can beat them. Good politicians always run scared and work hard to re-win voter support even if their re-election is certain.
State Sen. Jim Dabakis suddenly retired as State Democratic Party chair, for health reasons, but will continue as a state senator. What impact does this have on Utah Democrats?
Pignanelli: Dabakis was a controversial chairman, but generated excitement in some ranks. He may be the best fundraiser the party ever produced. He organized a great staff, which will minimize any disruption in campaign support for candidates. Republicans are disappointed because they love to caricature an outspoken Democrat as a dire threat to Utahns –a role Dabakis played with enthusiasm. (I was the GOP’s monster de jure in the late 1980s.)