Kerry Soelberg in his article of March 25 clearly indicates his understanding of a caucus as a meeting. My dictionary, however, also defines a caucus as a group of people with shared concerns within a political party. If more people would acknowledge this broader meaning of caucus their satisfaction with the process would be enhanced.
How about discussing issues of common interest with like-minded neighbors in the days, weeks, and months preceding the caucus meeting? How about distributing written statements of your personal positions on important issues? You may be pleased with the results.
J. Allen Kimball
Salt Lake City
- Can you pass the U.S. citizenship test?
- W. Bradford Wilcox: The new progressive...
- In our opinion: Don't 'Army-ize' local police...
- John Hoffmire: To feed the world, we must...
- Letter: Singles solution
- Charles Krauthammer: The jihadi logic
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Are...
- Letter: Protect public lands
- My view: Utah, where do you stand on... 96
- W. Bradford Wilcox: The new progressive... 43
- Letter: Bush dilemma 2.0 42
- In our opinion: Don't 'Army-ize' local... 28
- George F. Will: Obama needs Congress to... 27
- Can you pass the U.S. citizenship test? 27
- In our opinion: How committed are... 26
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Are... 21