Former senator Ted Kaufman wrote:
“In the months after 9/11, Vice President Dick Cheney repeatedly invoked the principle that if there’s even a 1 percent chance of a terrorist attack, we must prepare as if it were a certainty.”
Can a rational human being who doesn’t believe in climate change at least agree there is a remote possibility that 95 percent of climate scientists are right? Maybe a 1 percent chance? If so, shouldn’t we prudently prepare ‘as if it were a certainty?’
Since 9/11 the United States has essentially followed this doctrine and thankfully we have not had a repeat of that fateful day. Unfortunately we have largely ignored the impact of climate change which potentially may have vastly greater consequences. Why?
Change is tough and our government, corporations and each of us resist change. We don’t take much persuading to go on living as normal. Another barrier to substantial alterations is that there is no enemy to unite against. If anything we are part of the problem. It is always much more difficult to confront the beams in our own eyes than to find the mote in some distant “enemy,” but we must.
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet
- School fees: Is Utah really family friendly?
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to inversion is...
- Jay Evensen: Utahns support Common Core, even...
- 20 of the most influential and innovative...
- Michael Gerson: State of Israel: History...
- Letter: Society puzzles
- Equality in family life does not mean sameness
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb:... 82
- Letter: Police brutality 62
- School fees: Is Utah really family... 48
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse... 43
- Richard Davis: The State Board can do... 42
- Constitutional commitments trump tribal... 35
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet 33
- Join the discussion: Is Common Core... 29