Utah PTA calls for veto of curriculum review bill

Published: Thursday, March 20 2014 4:17 p.m. MDT

Utah Capitol Building.

Shutterstock

Enlarge photo»

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah's Parent Teacher Association has joined in the call for a veto of SB257, a bill that expands the duties of a statewide test review committee to include the fielding of complaints related to curriculum and instructional materials.

In a letter Wednesday to Gov. Gary Herbert, the Utah PTA accuses SB257 of failing to specify the role and scope of the review committee's new responsibilities, placing a potentially heavy burden on its volunteer members and bypassing local control of curriculum decisions.

"This legislation was pushed through (the Utah) House in the midnight hour without any House committee hearing taking place, debate was minimal, and the bill passed by 38-37 vote," the letter states. "It is easy to question whether such legislation is wise and reflects the best interest of the people of the state of Utah."

The Utah PTA is the first organization to formally support a veto of SB257, but individual parents — including members of the review committee — have voiced concerns about the bill.

"I don’t see how a parent from St. George reviewing complaints on curriculum in Cache County is going to solve anything," said Alean Hunt, a member of the review committee.

Nate McDonald, a spokesman for the governor's office, said the bill is under review. The State Board of Education will also discuss whether to request a veto of SB257 during its meeting Friday.

The bill's sponsor, Sen. Howard Stephenson, R-Draper, said feedback on SB257 has been mixed, but he believes some of the opposition is due to a misunderstanding of the legislation.

Stephenson said members of the review committee were under the impression they would be required to review all curriculum and instruction materials in the state, as they did with the state's new computer adaptive testing system.

"It would be inappropriate for the panel to hear a complaint about local instructional materials that hadn’t previously been reviewed by a local school board," he said. "(Complaints) should be fully vetted at the local level, and if people still have concerns, they should make an appeal."

Stephenson said, in hindsight, he should have put language in the bill specifying that the review committee would serve in an appellate capacity. He said if the bill is signed into law, he would consider sponsoring clarifying legislation next year, or those clarifications could be made by the State School Board through policy.

But Linda Hansen, an instructional materials commissioner for the state, said an appeals process already exists for curriculum decisions made at the local school district level.

When parents disagree with the decisions of their school board members, Hansen said, they have the power to elect new ones.

"If they don’t like what the school board person does, they can toss them out and get new people," she said. "That happens all the time."

Hansen said she has personally written to Herbert requesting a veto of SB257. She said the bill is shortsighted, neglecting the established process for developing curriculum and creating a new level of bureaucratic review that potentially overlaps with the Instructional Materials Commission on which she serves.

The commission, made up of parents and educators, meets twice a year to review curriculum standards and materials and make recommendations to school districts.

Under SB257, parents would be charged with reviewing any number of curriculum complaints but would have no power to act on their review, Hansen said.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS