In a recent Wall Street Journal piece, economist Edward P. Lazear suggested that a better understanding of the current employment landscape comes not from counting the number of people employed, but rather by determining the average number of hours worked per week by those currently employed. If 100 full-time workers are replaced by 120 half-time workers, there is a net loss of employment.
Based on numbers since last September, the job market has gained about 900,000 workers. The average workweek has declined, however, equivalent to losing 1 million jobs over the same period, resulting in a net loss of 100,000 seasonally adjusted jobs.
This is just one more sign that meaningful indicators are often buried under less helpful but better-looking numbers.
- In our opinion: Parents reading to young...
- Letter: Pay for your share
- Drew Clark: What President Obama does well:...
- Letter: Peanut butter ban?
- Letter: Repeating past mistakes
- Ron Clegg: Primary seat belt law will save lives
- In our opinion: Supreme Court rules...
- John Florez: Education is 'app' to change...
- In our opinion: Obama's State of the... 71
- Jay Evensen: Obama must make religious... 54
- In our opinion: How immigration reform... 43
- 6 important takeaways for families in... 37
- In our opinion: Supreme Court rules... 35
- Letter: Not so lazy 34
- Jay Evensen: Leave free tuition... 31
- Doug Robinson: NFL overtime rules need... 27