In a recent Wall Street Journal piece, economist Edward P. Lazear suggested that a better understanding of the current employment landscape comes not from counting the number of people employed, but rather by determining the average number of hours worked per week by those currently employed. If 100 full-time workers are replaced by 120 half-time workers, there is a net loss of employment.
Based on numbers since last September, the job market has gained about 900,000 workers. The average workweek has declined, however, equivalent to losing 1 million jobs over the same period, resulting in a net loss of 100,000 seasonally adjusted jobs.
This is just one more sign that meaningful indicators are often buried under less helpful but better-looking numbers.
- In our opinion: Marriage definition on...
- Drew Clark: Can the Supreme Court find...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: We can't help...
- Peter Corroon: Generalizations about liberals...
- Letter: Climate change is unjustified rhetoric
- Letter: No oversight at all
- Jay Evensen: U.S. silence troubling amid...
- Letter: We can do better
- Richard Davis: A historic moment for... 60
- Jay Evensen: U.S. silence troubling... 59
- In our opinion: Marriage definition on... 58
- Letter: Climate change is unjustified... 38
- Letter: We can do better 27
- A. Scott Anderson: Overregulation hurts... 26
- Letter: Pledge for respect 25
- Peter Corroon: Generalizations about... 25