It doesn't have to be hard for liberalism to tolerate religious freedom
Ross D. Franklin, Associated Press
Modern American liberalism has unnecessarily pitted itself against an expansive view of religious freedom, according to The Week’s Michael Brendan Dougherty.
“The battle over religious liberty is a conflict within liberalism itself,” Dougherty wrote on March 7. “In one corner are the liberal values of pluralism and tolerance. In the other are the liberal projects of egalitarianism and administrative efficiency.”
Dougherty then argues that the defeat of Arizona’s SB1062 — which he calls “Arizona's attempt to clarify its state version of the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act” — is “evidence that our increasingly monocultural elite class is inclined to resolve these conflicts in favor of its egalitarian goals.” But that isn’t the only option for American liberalism.
“Liberalism should have the confidence to tolerate institutions, even large ones, that have competing and contrary missions to those of the state,” he concludes. “The very liberality of the managerial state is guaranteed by real diversity, not just of skin color and sexual preference, but of religion and values, too.”
- A beleaguered family — 12 in 4...
- About Utah: Jen Seelig came to Utah and made...
- In our opinion: Six heroes for our values in...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Our year-end...
- John Florez: The people's voices don't count
- Robert Bennett: Finally, good possibilities...
- Letter: Distance from religion
- Letter: Removing Reid's name
- Letter: Access to health care 42
- John Florez: The people's voices don't... 41
- Letter: Distance from religion 35
- In our opinion: Police vs. protests... 32
- Letter: Sharing culpability 22
- In our opinion: Keep marriage questions 21
- A. Scott Anderson: Peace on earth comes... 15
- Mark Reynolds: Cheap gas prices... 15