It doesn't have to be hard for liberalism to tolerate religious freedom
Ross D. Franklin, Associated Press
Modern American liberalism has unnecessarily pitted itself against an expansive view of religious freedom, according to The Week’s Michael Brendan Dougherty.
“The battle over religious liberty is a conflict within liberalism itself,” Dougherty wrote on March 7. “In one corner are the liberal values of pluralism and tolerance. In the other are the liberal projects of egalitarianism and administrative efficiency.”
Dougherty then argues that the defeat of Arizona’s SB1062 — which he calls “Arizona's attempt to clarify its state version of the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act” — is “evidence that our increasingly monocultural elite class is inclined to resolve these conflicts in favor of its egalitarian goals.” But that isn’t the only option for American liberalism.
“Liberalism should have the confidence to tolerate institutions, even large ones, that have competing and contrary missions to those of the state,” he concludes. “The very liberality of the managerial state is guaranteed by real diversity, not just of skin color and sexual preference, but of religion and values, too.”
- Can you pass the U.S. citizenship test?
- John Florez: Utah public education is a house...
- In our opinion: How committed are Obama, U.S....
- 19 songs to consider as replacements for the...
- Charles Krauthammer: The jihadi logic
- Catherine Rampell: Have America's public...
- My view: Utah, where do you stand on marriage?
- W. Bradford Wilcox: The new progressive...
- My view: Utah, where do you stand on... 93
- Ralph Hancock: Society cannot... 76
- Letter: Bush dilemma 2.0 37
- George F. Will: Obama needs Congress to... 27
- Richard Davis: Scots — Be brave,... 25
- In our opinion: Accountability,... 25
- My view: Intergenerational poverty the... 19
- Mary Barker: Religion and politics... 17