I very much enjoy reading Dan Liljenquist's articles. Recently though, he described one of the tactics of proponents for the "Count My Vote" initiative as "bait and switch." How would he describe the efforts of members of our Legislature some time back to initiate term limits for themselves?
By my recollection, a law was passed at the same time that there was a pending citizen initative to change the Utah Constitution to limit legislators' terms. With that assurance, we didn't change the Constitution. Subsequently when the first wave of legislators were about to be termed out of office, we were informed we would be losing valuable knowledge and expertise and they revoked the previous law, allowing themselves to continue in office.
Will Mr. Liljenquist be kind enough to inform us if this piece of history could be described as "bait and switch," and if he sees any similarities with what happened then, and what is happening now?
- 10 things you never knew about the FBI
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook for...
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- Robert Bennett: Hamas and its financial...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Re-enactment...
- Letter: Policy disagreement
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have voted for
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 108
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 72
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 61
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and... 50
- In our opinion: History will remember... 46
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 44
- Letter: Policy disagreement 44
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 41