I very much enjoy reading Dan Liljenquist's articles. Recently though, he described one of the tactics of proponents for the "Count My Vote" initiative as "bait and switch." How would he describe the efforts of members of our Legislature some time back to initiate term limits for themselves?
By my recollection, a law was passed at the same time that there was a pending citizen initative to change the Utah Constitution to limit legislators' terms. With that assurance, we didn't change the Constitution. Subsequently when the first wave of legislators were about to be termed out of office, we were informed we would be losing valuable knowledge and expertise and they revoked the previous law, allowing themselves to continue in office.
Will Mr. Liljenquist be kind enough to inform us if this piece of history could be described as "bait and switch," and if he sees any similarities with what happened then, and what is happening now?
- Letter: No labels in 2016?
- John Florez: Businesses should help pay for...
- In our opinion: Research suggests that...
- Arthur Cyr: US presidential politics reflects...
- Letter: Our public lands
- Dan Liljenquist: What we learned from the...
- My view: Your family stories have the power...
- My view: The solution to Utah's water problems
- Richard Davis: Do presidents have to be... 56
- My view: Get insurance out of health care 49
- My view: Obama's veto won't save Obamacare 35
- In our opinion: Attempting to... 32
- My view: 'Death with dignity' and... 27
- In our opinion: Concerned voters a good... 23
- Dan Liljenquist: What we learned from... 19
- Mantua speed trap 17