Quantcast

Governor says special session may be needed on Medicaid expansion

Published: Tuesday, March 4 2014 8:06 p.m. MST

After pitching his plan personally to GOP lawmakers Tuesday, Gov. Gary Herbert said the details of how Medicaid expansion money would be used may have to be sorted out in a special session of the Legislature.

Laura Seitz, Deseret News

Enlarge photo»

SALT LAKE CITY — After pitching his plan personally to GOP lawmakers Tuesday, Gov. Gary Herbert said the details of how Medicaid expansion money would be used may have to be sorted out in a special session of the Legislature.

But the governor said he expects "clear direction" before the 2014 Legislature ends March 13 to start negotiations about how the state can use what he says is $258 million available under the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.

"I would like to have them give me that authorization, that blessing, that 'go get 'em cowboy' kind of an approach and see what we can do back in Washington. I'm very optimistic," Herbert said.

His plan to accept all of the federal money offered for a state-administered program to provide health care coverage for low-income Utahns willing to work is competing with proposals from the House and Senate.

House Speaker Becky Lockhart, R-Provo, is pushing a plan to reject the Medicaid expansion money in favor of spending some $35 million in state funds for limited insurance coverage using existing state programs.

And Sen. Brian Shiozawa, R-Cottonwood Heights, wants to use only a portion of the Medicaid expansion money to cover just those Utahns who would otherwise not receive subsidies under Obamacare.

Neither the House nor Senate GOP caucuses could agree which plan to back Tuesday. Herbert met behind closed doors with the Senate GOP caucus and sent Lt. Gov. Spencer Cox, a former state representative, to the House caucus.

"There's three different proposals out there, and we've got eight days to reconcile them. We will," Herbert told reporters, even though that may only be "a plan to have a plan" with few specifics.

"We won't have everybody happy, you know. But we'll have clear direction that the governor needs to go back to Washington and negotiate a deal," Herbert said. "I'm going to go back, and I'm going to do it."

He said the law requires him to make decisions about Medicaid expansion in conjunction with the Legislature.

"I'm not worried about not having authorization or the ability to go back. I will work with the Legislature," Herbert said.

Cox, who spoke to House Republicans before they closed their caucus, started off by saying the issue had become "fairly toxic" and they all should be able to agree that they hate Obamacare.

"I'm here to talk you into the best of four crappy decisions," Cox said, telling the House Republicans repeatedly the governor is looking for their help. "The governor's plan is not set in stone at all."

House members appeared to have little interest in the argument Cox made that Utah taxpayers are already paying more than $800 million a year toward Obamacare and should get some of that money back.

Rep. Brad Wilson, R-Kaysville, said it would be politically difficult to reverse a program created by the governor's plan.

"It seems to be an irreversible decision," Wilson said, adding that those should be made slowly.

And Rep. Ken Ivory, R-West Jordan, warned the federal funding pledged to the states for Medicaid expansion was not sustainable because of the nation's debt.

"It's really just a classic Ponzi scheme," Ivory said.

Rep. Dean Sanpei, R-Provo, who helped draft the House plan, said it appears the governor is focused only on getting the maximum amount of money from the federal government, not the most flexibility for using it.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS