On Feb. 12, Gerald Larsen listed “Count My Vote’s five major flaws.”
Here is my brief rebuttal.
First, Larsen claims face-to-face communication is the best way to vet candidates, thus let’s keep caucuses. In our age there are numerous ways to communicate with candidates, but CMV will not eliminate face-to-face encounters. A direct primary election encourages this but with more citizens, not just delegates.
Second, election of incumbents will be less automatic if caucuses continue, says Larsen. Statistics contradict this. More than 90 percent of incumbents in Utah are re-elected using the current caucus system.
Third, Larsen implies that candidates selected by grass-roots delegates are a better choice. It’s past time for Utah’s elected officials to be elected by the people, all the people, through a direct primary election where every vote is equal, and elected officials listen to all constituents without giving special attention to delegates.
Fourth, Larsen says that open primary elections, where Democrats can vote in Republican primaries, are an invitation for mischief, yet Count My Vote does not propose this change. Nor does CMV address making “caucuses more convenient,” his fifth listed flaw.
Clearly, it is Larsen’s arguments against Count My Vote that are flawed.
North Salt Lake
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- Can Hollywood keep the faith in faith-based...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Re-enactment...
- Letter: Policy disagreement
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have voted for
- My view: Circuit Court's Obamacare decision...
- Letter: Outdated climate
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 69
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 64
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 61
- In our opinion: History will remember... 46
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and... 46
- Letter: Breeding hate 45
- Letter: Policy disagreement 37
- In our opinion: Use market forces and... 32