Oscar insight: It’s slim pickings for family audiences among top nominees
“Jonah Hill has more acting Oscar nominations than Robert Redford,” points out The Daily Beast’s Kevin Fallon in his article “10 Facts about the 2014 Oscar Nominations That Will Make You Sad.”
Another one, according to Fallon: “Six of the nine Best Picture nominees are rated R. The rest are PG-13. This is sad if you're not an adult. Or have a family. Or are even slightly wholesome.”
The biggest night of the year in Hollywood — a night when the stars gather to celebrate the greatest achievements in the world of cinema — is one that, unfortunately, might not hold a lot of interest for family audiences, who have frequently been left out in the cold when it comes to the major categories at the Oscars.
Especially in recent years, the Academy Awards have tended to favor the more “serious” subject matter that seems to be almost the exclusive domain of R-rated movies nowadays. Out of the last 30 Best Picture winners, exactly two in three — the same ratio as this year’s nominees — have been rated R.
Of the rest, only two were rated PG, and not a single one was rated G. In fact, pooling all 170 nominations in the Best Picture category since 1983, there have been only three G-rated nominees total, and two of them were animated.
Which is all to say that, for families, the Oscars can feel a little bit like watching a stranger unwrap Christmas presents: It may be fun enough while it lasts, but it’s hard to feel overly invested in the results.
Not only does this year not deviate from the trend, it’s also one of the more “restricted” years in recent memory. Most of the categories are overwhelmingly dominated by R-rated material, including the four acting categories, only two of which even feature performances from PG-13 movies (Best Actress for Judi Dench in “Philomena” and Sandra Bullock in “Gravity,” and Best Supporting Actor for Barkhad Abdi in “Captain Phillips”).
Of course, not all R ratings are created equal. The rest of the films run the gamut in terms of content and subject matter. The R rating for “12 Years a Slave,” for “violence/cruelty, some nudity and brief sexuality,” for instance, is certainly different from that of “The Wolf of Wall Street,” which includes Quaalude-and-cocaine binges, graphic sexual content and, according to a tally by Slate’s Forrest Wickman, a record-breaking 544 F-bombs — 541 more than the minimum to automatically earn it an R. (Other websites quote slightly different numbers; all are pretty mind-boggling.)
While the latter film has been widely criticized for glorifying the greed and debauchery it supposedly seeks to indict — and possibly helping to further line the pockets of the real-life Jordan Belfort, according to Indiewire — Steve McQueen’s “12 Years a Slave” earns what some might consider a responsible R rating for realistically portraying the atrocities of antebellum America. Although not completely accurate to every detail of Solomon Northup’s autobiographical account of his time as a slave, it has been praised for its accuracy to the slave experience as a whole. As film critic Susan Wloszczyna wrote in her review of the film, watching it will make viewers feel “that they have actually witnessed American slavery in all its appalling horror for the very first time.”
- Sadie Robertson lets her light shine during...
- Mormon creator of 'Battlestar Galactica'...
- Capturing 'Mormon Faces': LDS mother,...
- Review: 'Smash Bros.' makes brutality adorable
- Consumer group lists '10 worst toys' for kids
- A community of theater: Utah theater...
- What's new: 'Walk Beside Me' adds vibrancy to...
- Iggy Azalea, Taylor Swift set for 2014 AMAs