How disappointing that the House Education Committee voted 10-5 to advance HB81, which would permit public school parents to review questions, even questions their child will not see, on Utah’s standardized tests — even before administration. Unfortunately, HB81’s financial and educational costs outweigh its benefits.
Permitting access to test questions increases the chances that question content will lose confidentiality. Replacing one publicly disclosed question would cost the state thousands of dollars. When Ohio passed a similar law, taxpayers saw increased costs. The bill would also make cheating easier, which would invalidate test results.
And the bill’s benefits are minimal. Why parents should see questions that will not be administered to their children is unclear. Its sponsor, Rep. Michael Kennedy (R-Alpine), says HB81 increases transparency. But the Utah State Office of Education already publicizes a great deal of information about the tests and their development. Moreover, a committee of 15 parents already evaluated every question. Why do more parents need to examine the test?
If the legislature must permit parents to review questions, it should follow the standards for the practice, such as only allowing review after administration and forbidding note-taking during review. The Utah State Office of Education should also have discretion to create policies that ensure test confidentiality.
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act needs...
- Doug Robinson: Violence against women is...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- My view: Powdr Corp and Park City Mountain...
- The relationship between religiosity and...
- Improving voter turnout still a tough nut to...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 74
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 53
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Letter: Policy disagreement 45
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 39
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36
- Join the discussion: Is it impossible... 32