Both the political bills and citizen activity surrounding our inversion have intensified as the air has worsened. The familiar plaint we hear from the governor’s office is that only 11 percent of the pollution is due to industrial sources. Thus, the state’s partial solution to improving the situation is for the average citizen to change his or her behavior: drive less, use public transport, purchase energy-efficient vehicles, avoid wood burning fires and stoves, ride a bike and walk.
The last two suggestions seem hardly healthy in the face of bad air.
It is hard for those of us who inhabit happy valley to believe that the refineries to the west of the valley, the medical recycling facilities, and Rio Tinto are responsible for such a minuscule portion of our environmental problem.
With all the discussion due to ensue during the legislative session let’s hope we get clarification of the portion of the inversion caused by industry, so that responsibility for rectifying the situation can be squarely placed where it belongs.
Salt Lake City
- 10 things you never knew about the FBI
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook for...
- Robert Bennett: Hamas and its financial...
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Re-enactment...
- Letter: Policy disagreement
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have voted for
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 109
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 72
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 61
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and... 52
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 46
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 45
- Letter: Policy disagreement 45
- In our opinion: Use market forces and... 33