The justification for your position against net neutrality is flawed, for the primary reason that broadband providers are generally a monopoly in Utah communities. This is the case where I live, CenturyLink notwithstanding as they do not have a competitive offering.
This makes the monopoly a common carrier first and a content provider second, at least from the perspective of a consumer. Without net neutrality Comcast will be free to throttle Netflix in favor of Xfinity offerings, which gives Comcast an unfair advantage. This issue disappears in communities where there is competition; with the added advantage of significantly lower subscription rates — specifically due to that competition.
Further, I definitely do not want my common carrier censoring content unless that censoring is an option within my individual control.
- In our opinion: Marriage definition on...
- About Utah: Big-time golf in little ol'...
- Drew Clark: Can the Supreme Court find...
- Peter Corroon: Generalizations about liberals...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: We can't help...
- Letter: No oversight at all
- Letter: Climate change is unjustified rhetoric
- Letter: Bullying time
- In our opinion: Marriage definition on... 76
- Richard Davis: A historic moment for... 60
- Jay Evensen: U.S. silence troubling... 59
- Letter: Climate change is unjustified... 41
- Peter Corroon: Generalizations about... 34
- Letter: We can do better 27
- A. Scott Anderson: Overregulation hurts... 26
- In our opinion: Recent drowning of 800... 22