The justification for your position against net neutrality is flawed, for the primary reason that broadband providers are generally a monopoly in Utah communities. This is the case where I live, CenturyLink notwithstanding as they do not have a competitive offering.
This makes the monopoly a common carrier first and a content provider second, at least from the perspective of a consumer. Without net neutrality Comcast will be free to throttle Netflix in favor of Xfinity offerings, which gives Comcast an unfair advantage. This issue disappears in communities where there is competition; with the added advantage of significantly lower subscription rates — specifically due to that competition.
Further, I definitely do not want my common carrier censoring content unless that censoring is an option within my individual control.
- Robert J. Samuelson: The Olympic sinkhole
- In our opinion: Finding – not forcing...
- Drew Clark: Will 2016 be the breakout year...
- My view: The supergentrification of Sugar House
- Michael Gerson: The Dalai Lama's path to peace
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The 'bathroom...
- My view: Patriotic Millionaires urges Hatch...
- Charles Krauthammer: Donald, Hillary and the...
- In our opinion: Finding – not... 81
- Letter: Nothing is 'free' 57
- Richard Davis: Who needs to go to the... 37
- My view: Mitt Romney's Harry Potter... 31
- In our opinion: Those intolerable TSA... 22
- Jay Evensen: Like it or not, politics... 22
- In our opinion: A social media enabled... 21
- On Second Thought: A lighthearted look... 19