The justification for your position against net neutrality is flawed, for the primary reason that broadband providers are generally a monopoly in Utah communities. This is the case where I live, CenturyLink notwithstanding as they do not have a competitive offering.
This makes the monopoly a common carrier first and a content provider second, at least from the perspective of a consumer. Without net neutrality Comcast will be free to throttle Netflix in favor of Xfinity offerings, which gives Comcast an unfair advantage. This issue disappears in communities where there is competition; with the added advantage of significantly lower subscription rates — specifically due to that competition.
Further, I definitely do not want my common carrier censoring content unless that censoring is an option within my individual control.
- Mike Lee: Change is coming to Washington
- Jay Evensen: Should Utah raise its gas tax?...
- Susan Roylance: Definition of the family put...
- My view: Chaffetz named ‘politician of...
- My view: Torture, morality and the laws of war
- Letter: Wood burning an easy target
- Letter: Bring the prison here
- Kathleen Parker: Placing blame for massive...
- Charles Krauthammer: Democrats use... 78
- In our opinion: Police training should... 44
- Mike Lee: Change is coming to Washington 42
- In our opinion: Wood burning ban... 37
- Robert Bennett: More political... 36
- Letter: Patriots or serfs? 33
- Paul Mero: Reasonable solution to... 30
- Susan Roylance: Definition of the... 28