A modern riddle: In order to survive, corporations generally need consumers to buy their products in increasing quantities. In order to generate profits, which most corporations mistakenly view as their primary purpose, they need to keep costs under control.
This leads executives to ship jobs overseas, demand increased productivity from current workers, pay lower wages, replace workers with technology, and do away with pension plans. So most consumers are asked to do the impossible: spend more on consumable goods and services and save for retirement while receiving less in real wages than they did last year.
Meanwhile, the most financially fortunate members of society are amassing wealth at unprecedented rates and enjoying impressively low tax rates. They then claim they cannot invest in new production or new jobs because there is inadequate demand for their products. This seems to be an admission that supply-side economics is a sham.
Can they not see that the system they have paid legislators to preserve for them is unsustainable? The current corporate system of wealth distribution is a parasite that thrives by killing its host.
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- 10 things you never knew about the FBI
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- Can Hollywood keep the faith in faith-based...
- Robert Bennett: Hamas and its financial...
- Letter: Policy disagreement
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Re-enactment...
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook for...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 81
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 70
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 61
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and... 48
- In our opinion: History will remember... 46
- Letter: Breeding hate 45
- Letter: Policy disagreement 40
- In our opinion: Use market forces and... 33