Each time there is an election there appears dismal reports of voter turnout. How can we possibly expect to increase participation in the democratic process if the judiciary of the United States nullifies the bipartisan actions like the Defense of Marriage Act? How can we possibly expect to increase participation in the democratic process when a federal judge can nullify an amendment to a state constitution like Amendment 3? The judicial branch is sending the message that those who participate in the voting process do not matter.
A republican form of government is commonly called a democracy and includes the principle of the voice of the people through the ballot box. The judicial branch obviously does not follow the constitutional principle, which it swears to uphold. This is malfeasance.
It's ironic that the state of Utah, which was delayed approval for statehood and given the mandate from the federal government to implement "a man and a woman" marriage system, should see this principle turned around by the judiciary.
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet
- School fees: Is Utah really family friendly?
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to inversion is...
- Letter: Society puzzles
- 20 of the most influential and innovative...
- Equality in family life does not mean sameness
- Jay Evensen: Utahns support Common Core, even...
- Michael Gerson: State of Israel: History...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb:... 82
- Letter: Police brutality 62
- School fees: Is Utah really family... 48
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse... 43
- Richard Davis: The State Board can do... 42
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet 39
- Constitutional commitments trump tribal... 35
- Letter: Society puzzles 32