Your editorial ("Holly refinery should be allowed to expand," Dec. 12) supports expansion without consideration of all the facts. The expansion review process should factor in all added sources of pollution and attendant consequences. Despite contentions to the contrary, it is acknowledged that expansion will result in an increase of some of the most harmful types of pollution. It is also known that several other refineries are considering expansion, and there is no consideration of the ultimate combined additional pollution of these several refineries.
Because the type of waxy crude that will be refined can't be hauled by train, Holly's own estimates show more tanker truck traffic amounting to 160 vehicles daily, on an interchange that is often over capacity. Holly has tried to couch this additional traffic in statistical terms that suggest it is inconsequential.
But recently, the federal government classed diesel emissions in the same class of carcinogens as asbestos. The creation of 45 jobs is small compensation for the additional health consequences, also well documented, to the citizens in the fish bowl that is the Salt Lake Valley. The negatives of expansion far outweigh any benefit to the state and people of Utah.
- 19 songs to consider as replacements for the...
- Ralph Hancock: Society cannot 'progress'...
- My view: Medicaid will sting Beehive State's...
- Jay Evensen: U2's 'free' album highlights...
- Letter: Moral decline
- Letter: My sons
- Brian S. Brown: In defending marriage, Utah...
- John Hoffmire: Unknowingly raising another...
- Letter: Moral decline 88
- Ralph Hancock: Society cannot... 66
- Brian S. Brown: In defending marriage,... 57
- In our opinion: Some universities... 46
- Politico Magazine: If Mitt Romney runs... 44
- Robert Bennett: Obama should not move... 40
- My view: Government broadband spells... 28
- In our opinion: Revisiting racial... 25