Richard Davis recommends "nonpartisan" elections for the attorney general ("Don't turn AG into an appointed position," Dec. 4). At present, municipal and school board elections are nonpartisan in Utah, but they are a sham. Is anyone really unaware in those elections of the party affiliations of the candidates or the fact that the party organizations actively support candidates? Is the mayor of Salt Lake City, for example, really a nonpartisan?
Consider a hypothetical situation of an elected nonpartisan attorney general who is a de facto member of a party different from that of the governor. Does anyone in the real world doubt that he would likely use his office to undermine the governor, insofar as was possible, while positioning himself to run for that office? Partisanship is the ugly side of democracy that, unfortunately, we have to live with.
Wyoming, among other states, has an appointed attorney general. As a member of the Wyoming Bar, and a registered independent voter, I can say that the appointed attorney general has worked extremely well in practice and removes one more office for which campaign funds must be raised.
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act needs...
- Doug Robinson: Violence against women is...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- My view: Powdr Corp and Park City Mountain...
- The relationship between religiosity and...
- Improving voter turnout still a tough nut to...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 75
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 53
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Letter: Policy disagreement 45
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 40
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36
- Join the discussion: Is it impossible... 32