But not really.
Ward refused to criticize the NCAA even though its ineptness cost him most of his senior season. He is a guileless young man; unfortunately, I am neither. I'll say what needs to be said. Or written, whatever.
The good news is that NCAA officials saw the light; the bad news: Why didn’t they see it in the first place?
The NCAA probably thinks it deserves a pat on the back. I tend to think it needs a kick somewhere lower.
For the record, this is the third time in three months the NCAA has reinstated athletes it has previously declared ineligible for the same infraction. We are forced to conclude that either NCAA officials were previously careless, cavalier and/or sloppy with peoples’ lives, or now they are suddenly enlightened, although I happen to believe it was more a case of political expediency. The NCAA is very unpopular these days and deservedly so; the last thing it needs is bad pub, and all three of the aforementioned cases delivered big doses of it and punched more holes in the NCAA’s armor.
Let’s see Last week the NCAA reinstated Nathan Harries, a returned Mormon missionary and Colgate basketball player who had been ruled ineligible for an entire season because he played in three church basketball games.
In late August, the NCAA reinstated Steven Rhodes, a former Marine and would-be football player at Middle Tennessee State who had been ruled ineligible for two years because he played in a recreational football league on a military base.
This week the NCAA reinstated Ward, another returned missionary who was declared ineligible for competing in what was basically a fun run.
And common sense was just given the last rites.
All three cases produced public outrage after their stories were reported and then posted and linked on websites around the country. The Harries case was reversed two days after it was reported by the Atlanta Journal Constitution. The Rhodes case was reversed one day after it was reported by CBS. The Ward case was reversed six days after it was reported in the Deseret News.
The NCAA didn’t overturn these cases because it was the right thing to do; it did so because it was getting barbecued in the media and then later because it also had established precedence.
The NCAA should never have sanctioned any of those athletes in the first place. NCAA rules forbid athletes one year removed from high school from competing in organized athletic events to prevent them from gaining a competitive advantage over collegiate athletes. How did that apply in these cases?
Harries was playing in what one observer called an “old man’s league” on a “C level” team against players who are mostly in their 30s, with some in their 50s and one man who had never played basketball.
As for Rhodes, he told ESPN, "It was like intramurals for us. There were guys out there anywhere from 18 to 40-something years old. We once went six weeks between games." Middle Tennessee State coach Rick Stockstill put it this way: “He spent five years defending our country. His (military) superiors strongly encouraged him to play on the football team to improve troop morale. He’s married and has two kids. He’s not even on scholarship. He only wants to follow his dream of playing college football and starting his degree.”
- Dick Harmon: Taysom Hill steals center stage...
- Fast start propels BYU past UConn, 35-10
- BYU's suspended players expected to be back...
- BYU coach, players answer questions at fireside
- High school football: Friday's roundup
- Dick Harmon: BYU victory comes with 4 rookies...
- Saturday morning quarterback: 3 stars and...
- Daniel Sorensen makes Chiefs 53-man roster,...
- College football predictions: How will... 141
- The good, the bad and the most likely:... 63
- First steps: Utes open season with... 63
- It's go time for the Utes: Utah kicks... 57
- Fast start propels BYU past UConn, 35-10 56
- CBS Sports analyst predicts BYU to Big... 55
- Brad Rock: One thing already missing in... 50
- Brad Rock: What the Utes now know: very... 48