The White House issued its own release, saying the meeting was "to discuss the progress that's been made" and "hear their input on existing challenges."
Well, that's one way of putting it.
Some consent to regret is better than none, I suppose, but the ultimate test of an apology is whether it results in restored trust. It isn't at all clear that Obama accomplished this with his exclusive, one-on-one interview. A straight, detailed talk directly to the American people would seem a better bet for the longer run.
Detailing the overhaul of a sixth of the economy may not make good TV, but the American people deserve better than "Sorry about the mess."
True contrition swells all hearts.
Kathleen Parker's email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Which states are best for tax payers?
- Doug Robinson: Horrific crimes show the thin...
- Jay Evensen: No more rent for inmates —...
- In our opinion: Western land standoff aside,...
- Letter: Right and wrong
- My view: Utah's agriculture industry needs...
- Robert Bennett: Immigration reform should...
- Lois M. Collins: Ukraine hoax fuels anger,...
- Letter: Right and wrong 91
- My view: Anti-science ruins the climate... 67
- Robert Bennett: Immigration reform... 64
- Letter: Science consensus is slow,... 49
- Letter: Amnesty for who? 43
- In our opinion: Confronted by power,... 40
- In our opinion: Western land standoff... 32
- Letter: Republican empathy too rare 28