My view: Education reforms, Obamacare destabilize state budgets
Jessie L. Bonner, AP
In March 2009, President Barack Obama gave governors $53.6 billion from the “State Fiscal Stabilization Fund” contained in the federal stimulus package. The money was to be used in exchange for the adoption of four federal K-12 education reforms. These reforms constitute a massive new education entitlement program similar to Obamacare, and a dismantling of local control over education.
Governors were directed to spend the funds “quickly” in order to bolster the economy. This directive has allowed the federal government to remake K-12 education in three years time without public knowledge, without using our representative form of government and without vetting the ongoing costs to states.
The US Department of Education’s website details the four federal education reforms that 46 states are almost done implementing:
- Adopt College-and-Career Ready standards and high-quality, valid and reliable assessments for all students.
- Develop and use pre-K through post-secondary and career data systems.
- Increase teacher effectiveness and ensure equitable distribution of qualified teachers.
- Turn around the lowest-performing schools.
With help from these and other original source documents, the translation of the reforms appears to be:
1. Adopt 2-Year college and job ready national standards to ensure that college diplomas are “equitable” and more attainable to the masses through a Common Core that is not internationally benchmarked.
Use federally-required Computer Adaptive Tests that will not be accessible to local teachers or administrators — or parents at a set point after they are given. Meanwhile, federal reformers are remaking America’s entire testing system by aligning all K-12 testing — including the GED, SAT and ACT — to Common Core so that subjective questions can assess real world knowledge as the means for social change. This overhaul is being orchestrated by the new head of the College Board, David Coleman, who is considered the architect of Common Core.
2. Develop interoperable data systems to track students from “cradle to career.”
The federal executive branch revised regulations within FERPA —privacy law — so that data tracking could occur without Congressional approval and so student identifiable data can be shared with stakeholders without parental consent. According to the Data Quality Campaign, student data should be linked with health, social services and criminal justice data systems.
3. Tie teacher pay to student test scores on Common Core tests and redistribute "highly effective” teachers by federal mandate.
The federal government’s idea of “highly effective” teachers means people who complete 5 weeks of training through Teach for America, or teachers who are accredited in programs dedicated to equit, diversity and social justice — not student achievement.)
4. Create new school grading systems to enforce the federal government’s equity measures on schools.
This explains why West High and other outstanding schools recently received failing grades. They are “underperforming” in equity measures. The system is not set up to evaluate the student achievement that local parents value, but rather the equity measures that social justice reformers demand.
- Senate defeats Obama in Justice nod
- Letter: Religious freedom
- In our opinion: Maintaining balance
- Doug Robinson: Utah man discovers powerful...
- My view: Adoption legislation: Children...
- Jay Evensen: Don't mess with a great Utah...
- Sen. Ted Cruz opens 2014 CPAC with...
- Dan Liljenquist: Count My Vote: Compromise...
- Letter: Minimum Wage insufficient 63
- Has Obama's foreign policy emboldened... 62
- Jay Evensen: Obama could use a dose of... 60
- Letter: Religious freedom 37
- Obama's biggest test: Ukraine 33
- Robert Bennett: Keystone: What... 32
- Michael Gerson: The GOP needs to... 22
- Letter: Reclassify ISPs as common carriers 19