Aaron Guile: Why Isiah Thomas is stitching mad at Karl Malone

By Aaron Guile

For the Deseret News

Published: Monday, Oct. 7 2013 9:40 a.m. MDT

Isiah Thomas decided he needed to be in the news again.

No team will ever allow him to coach after failing with the New York Knicks, Indiana Pacers, Toronto Raptors, Florida International University and the CBA, so Thomas has to earn a living doing something else.

Now the news is Thomas is potty-mouthing Karl Malone.

Sean Highkin at USA Today quotes Thomas with, “I always thought like Malone was the weakest link because he wasn’t a good foul shooter.”

Thomas claims Malone's poor foul shooting is why the Jazz failed in the 1997 and 1998 NBA Finals.

The free-throw shooting bit is a non-starter.

Highkin lists Malone’s career free-throw shooting percentage at 74.2 percent and Thomas’ at 75.9 percent. Thomas' 1.7 percent superiority is nothing, unless Thomas is critical of his own free-throw percentage. If Thomas needed something to prove Malone is a weak link, free-throw shooting isn't the right direction to take.

Thomas might know what he’s talking about, however. He is a former coach. He probably can spot a weak link a mile away. Being the head coach for at least four teams is probably what got him the TV coaching job. We all know TV coaches always know what they're talking about. We should trust Thomas.

As a player he wasn't half bad. He did win two championships with Detroit’s Bad Boy Pistons in ‘89 and ‘90. Malone never did that, so I suppose we should take Thomas at his word.

I just don’t buy it. Thomas knows Malone — with the rest of the Jazz — were a great squad. Malone is not a weak link. I have a different theory: Thomas is a bitter man. The stitches still hurt.

Jody Genessy of the Deseret News describes the stitches angle when, “In 1991 . . . (Thomas, Malone and Malone’s elbow) collided — when Malone smacked a driving Thomas to the floor — and resulted in the Pistons point guard receiving a reported 40 stitches above his eye.”

Forty stitches, but there was no mention of a football-type concussion.

If Malone concussed Thomas a bit, fans in New York, Indiana, Florida and Canada might like him a little. A concussion would explain coaching all those loses.

Thomas is sour grapes. He could never get past Jordan during the 1990s — much like the Jazz — and he needed to show some sort credibility by trashing another player.

Sticking it to Stockton wouldn’t work since John liked Thomas enough for the Hall of Fame. Ragging on the Jazz as a team wouldn’t work because coach Jerry Sloan would hunt him down and concuss him with another elbow; Bryon Russell worked extremely hard guarding Jordan, and the other players were no-names or had pot-bellies. So going after Malone is the only option available.

Jazz fans themselves have said as much as Thomas. He is likely cribbing notes from them. I have heard fans bemoan Malone as not being clutch or not having a killer instinct at least twenty-three-and-a-half-million times since Malone's draft date. But Malone is one of our own. It’s like me being critical of my brothers: I can do it, but I don’t tolerate it from others. I guess that's why Thomas raises Jazz fans' ire. I have read hundreds of ticked off Jazz fan comments on several sites. Genessy quotes a few of them in his article.

To support my hypothesis, I have two posits about Thomas’ statement. Malone was interviewed about Thomas’ non-pick for the Dream Team.

ESPNChicago.com writes Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen black-balled Thomas.

Try out the new DeseretNews.com design!
try beta learn more
Get The Deseret News Everywhere