Pablo Martinez Monsivais, Associated Press
Back in the ‘60s, when being pseudo informed was more de rigueur than today, the young were prone to ask, “What if they gave a war and nobody came?”
Never mind they were actually quoting from a 1930s poem often attributed to the German poet Bertolt Brecht, who was attacking pacifists and speaking out for bravery. It served their purposes, so long as the rest of the poem wasn’t recited. And, as I said, people were pseudo informed.
Today, lots of people fall into the “uninformed and proud of it” category. If it doesn’t come across their iPod or smartphone, they don’t know about it, and it won’t come across those devices unless they expressly reach out and grab it.
With the government poised to shut down at midnight over a political struggle that involves Obamacare, the Keystone pipeline and other things, people I speak with still are generally unaware anything is about to happen.
So I ask today, with apologies to Brecht and my old Hippie friends, “What if they shut down the government and nobody noticed?”
If you think that sounds preposterous, you’re probably listening to the politicians. President Obama said Monday a shutdown would throw a “wrench” into the economy. We’ve heard that before.
Just ask yourself this, when was the last time you heard anyone mention the word “sequestration”?
That was the word that described a set of across-the-board budget cuts that took effect last March. They were designed to be so gosh-darned awful that Republicans and Democrats would have to compromise to fix the nation’s long-term budget problems in order to avoid them. Failure to do so would bring such harm to the American people that it would be political suicide.
Hmm. Seven months later we seem to be doing just fine. The economy isn’t doing backflips, but it’s been years since we’ve seen those. Sequestration may have been a dumb way to cut the government, but no one is marching in the streets demanding an end to it.
A government shutdown would affect non-essential services. The big entitlements — Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid — would continue handing out benefits. Senior citizens wouldn’t mobilize. The military still would get paid. Courts would be hobbled, but would keep going for awhile.
Private businesses would keep humming. Your local governments would remain open, picking up garbage, sweeping the streets, dousing fires and catching bad guys.
Sure, national parks and museums would close, but how many people are planning family vacations to those spots in October? It may be April before anyone notices. The IRS might have to put audits on hold. I don’t anticipate many riots over that one. And about 800,000 workers associated with the government would be furloughed, without pay. That would have a negative effect on the economy, but keep in mind the total U.S. workforce stands at about 155 million people.
How ignorant are Americans about all this? That’s hard to say, but you might go broke underestimating it. CNBC did a poll. It asked half the respondents whether they favored Obamacare and the other half whether they favored the Affordable Care Act.
If you’re informed and savvy, you know those are two names for the very same thing. And yet the poll found that 46 percent dislike Obamacare and only 37 percent felt the same way about the Affordable Care Act.
Maybe the randomly selected respondents would have reacted just the same if the questions were reversed, but I doubt it. Call me a skeptic, but I’m guessing a lot of people had no idea what the pollster on the phone was talking about.
I’m well aware that shutting the government down is not the same as sequestration. It’s a much more serious thing. When Republicans last tried this, in 1995, they lost the public-opinion battle big time.
- In our opinion: Confronted by power, Christ...
- My view: Anti-science ruins the climate debate
- Charles Krauthammer: In our politics, full...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: A compilation...
- Letter: Amnesty for who?
- Letter: Republican empathy too rare
- George F. Will: Regulatory overkill —...
- Robert Bennett: Immigration reform should...
- There are no Frodos without Sams: The... 47
- George F. Will: Understanding our... 41
- Letter: Amnesty for who? 36
- In our opinion: An immigration opportunity 35
- My view: Anti-science ruins the climate... 34
- My view: Immigration reform just makes... 33
- My view: Eliminating the root cause of... 28
- In our opinion: In an entrepreneurial... 25