I read with interest the letter from Thomas Rust about his caucus experience. It represents one of an insider — a caucus representative. Naturally, one of those selected would want to preserve the system because of all the attention and exposure they get.
Let me give you my experience. I attended a neighborhood caucus meeting out of curiosity. I thought we were going to be able to provide input, have dialogue about positions and candidates. Instead we ended up electing people to represent me.
Each person who wanted to be a representative gave a 30-second speech. We then voted for individuals to attend the county meeting. Really? I had to select a person who I knew nothing about; nothing about their opinions and trust how they will vote? I had little or no time to vet these people. I felt like I was being discounted or that my opinion on primary candidates did not count. At least in a primary, where I can vote on any candidate, I can take time to truly understand all the candidates, and I get to vote how I want to. My vote counts.
I have lived in other states and prefer a primary where I can study all the candidates and decide on a candidate I prefer versus having someone I do not know decide that for me.
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- Dan Liljenquist: The economic impact of...
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the...
- In our opinion: Federal contracting executive...
- Capitalism and the common good: Fairness,...
- My view: Utah's Constitution requires state...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act needs...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 79
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 54
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 46
- Letter: Policy disagreement 45
- Join the discussion: Is feminism... 37
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the... 37