Inspirato, Associated Press
If you had unlimited vacation days, would you take them? In the views of the Christian Science Monitor, no you wouldn’t. In fact, you would probably end up wishing that you had a specified number of days off. “(I)t could be that only the employer benefits are real, and the employee benefits are mostly imaginary.”
In a scenerio where there are unlimited days off, the Monitor argues that while the employer certainly benefits from not having to track employee hours so thoroughly — and thus saves money — the average employee is left with no guidelines as to what is the acceptable amount of vacation both his boss, and his peers, are okay with.
“In a highly competitive, workaholic atmosphere, and without some guidelines as to what is normal or expected, employees may feel guilty about taking off any time at all. Are they slackers if they take two weeks? Three? Four? What’s appropriate? Will others who take less vacation, or no vacation, be viewed more favorably?”
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- Dan Liljenquist: The economic impact of...
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the...
- In our opinion: Federal contracting executive...
- My view: Utah's Constitution requires state...
- Perceptions of Obama and his policies at home...
- Capitalism and the common good: Fairness,...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 79
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 47
- Join the discussion: Is feminism... 38
- Capitalism and the common good:... 37
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the... 36