Interest on new undergraduate student loans will double on Monday

Published: Friday, June 28 2013 6:15 p.m. MDT

Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee Chairman Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, discusses a graph and legislation to try and prevent the increase in the interest rates on some student loans, Thursday, June 27, 2013, during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 27, 2013.

Susan Walsh, AP

Enlarge photo»

SALT LAKE CITY — As it stands now, undergraduates who apply for student loans beginning Monday will have to pay twice as much interest than at least half of Utah's undergraduate students are currently paying.

Interest rates are set to increase Monday to 6.8 percent for all student loan borrowers after the U.S. Senate failed to come to an agreement on the interest rates before heading into a holiday recess.

Currently, 52 percent of undergraduate student loan borrowers at Utah schools — a total of about 84,000 students — qualify for an interest rate of 3.4 percent on federally subsidized student loans, according to David Feitz, executive director of the Utah Higher Education Assistance Authority. But the federal lawmakers' inability to make a decision about whether to continue the discounted interest rates means all new loans issued after July 1 will come with a 6.8 percent interest rate.

Feitz said this change will not affect existing student loans or the students across the country who already pay a rate of 6.8 percent, including all graduate students and undergraduate students with unsubsidized loans or who didn't qualify for the lower rate under financial need standards as set by Congress.

He estimated that one-third of undergraduate students nationally qualified for the lower interest rate.

"The majority of students are already paying the 6.8 percent rate because the 3.4 percent rate applies only to undergraduate students who have financial need," Feitz said. "So it applies to a more narrow population, but it so happens that that population is made up of the most needy students."

He said the difference between the interest rate amounts on a $5,500 loan would only mean an increase of about $9 each month, but would be much more over the life of the loan. At 3.4 percent, interest would add up to $996 over 10 years, but at 6.8 percent, that number jumps to $2,096.

"The life of the loan interest cost is significantly more, but when money is tight and you have a lot of expenses to get established in your career, even $9 can make a lot of difference," Feitz said. "Keeping (interest rates) low are in the best interest of the students."

A report from the Joint Economic Committee showed that student debt rose from $550 billion in late 2007 to about $1 trillion in the first quarter this year. The same report said that without congressional action, the higher Stafford loan interest rates would add $4,500 to the cost of a four-year college degree.

In his 2014 budget proposal for the Department of Education, President Barack Obama proposed restructuring student loan interest rates, linking them to the 10-year Treasury rate with differing surcharges for subsidized and unsubsidized Stafford loans and PLUS graduate loans.

In May, the House passed legislation along party lines to do the same, though with slightly higher surcharges but an overall cap of 8.5 percent to protect student borrowers in the event of significant rate increases. Another key difference was that Obama’s plan would lock in the initial rate for the life of the loan, while the House plan would have rates reset each year.

The Senate this month considered a plan from Senate Republicans that also used a market-based solution, as well as a Democratic plan to extend current rates for one year.

Neither plan achieved the 60-vote threshold to defeat a filibuster. Thursday, Democrats said they would call the one-year extension plan to a vote once again July 10, after the rates have doubled.

Feitz said tying the student loan rate to a market rate is the most fair approach.

"The market mirrors the interest rate in the general economy instead of an artificial rate set by Congress," he said.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS