National Edition

The future of higher education is debatable

Published: Friday, June 14 2013 10:05 a.m. MDT

Massive Open Online Courses (or MOOCs) make education cheaper and more accessible, but some say they have potential to undermine the current profit model.

Shutterstock

New learning platforms driven by technology promise to make college learning less expensive and more accessible, but some say those radical changes could topple higher education’s traditional model.

That was the subject of a recent web-based video debate about the future of higher education titled “It’s the End of College as We Know It.” The discussion was part of New America Foundation’s “That’s Debatable” series about the next generation of college classrooms. The two education experts in the debate agreed that dramatic change is inevitable but diverged about what path it will take.

Kevin Carey, who writes a monthly column on college reform for the Chronicle of Higher Education, argued that the higher education model is outmoded and irreparably broken. He foresees a major disruption in the way colleges and universities operate, followed by development of technology-driven models better suited to 21st-century life.

The future of higher education doesn’t center on sweatpant-clad students learning from computers in their basements, he said, but many trappings of the traditional research university will give way to “authentic learning communities where people will learn from one another.”

MOOC metamorphosis

Carey writes often on the subject of MOOCs — Massive Open Online Courses taught on college campuses, but followed online in video format by people all over the world. Those who take the courses online do assignments and take tests along with the on-campus students and receive feedback via computer. Online students who finish the course requirements receive a certificate of completion. Typically, they don’t receive college credit.

When blue-chip schools like Harvard, Princeton and MIT began offering courses taught by their top professors in the MOOC format in 2012, the higher-education playing field changed dramatically, Carey said.

Until 2012, the only way to take a freshman class from acclaimed genetics professor Eric Lander at MIT was to be one of the very smartest 17-year-olds in the nation, get through the college-entrance “sweepstakes,” pay $50,000 in tuition, and show up in a building on campus, Carey said. Only 350 people could do it, because that’s how many could fit in the room.

“This year, there are tens of thousands of people taking the class,” he said. “The exact same lectures, problem sets and tests.”

Carey said he took the class too. He didn’t have to move to Massachusetts, and it took him less than a minute to sign up. And, like the other online students, he paid nothing.

MOOCs are not only changing higher education opportunities, Carey said. They are changing the economics of higher learning.

Adaptive learning

Arizona State University President Michael Crow holds that colleges can adapt to change and employ the newest technologies without having to re-invent themselves completely. He is integrating many technologies at ASU and considers MOOCs just one tool in his kit. It's an attractive one, he said, because professors can meld MOOCs into courses at no cost, perhaps saving on students’ textbook bills.

“I can integrate that into anything,” Crow said of MOOC classes. “If someone wants to give that to me for free, I’m going to take it.”

Crow said new software for adaptive learning has greater potential to improve learning than MOOCs, and ASU is using it with promising results.

“This interactive tool is allowing us to measure individualized learning experiences for every student in ways in which we can customize that experience.”

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS