Protecting the sanctity of life, even in a laboratory
Chris Radburn, Associated Press
Sir Robert Edwards, a Nobel Prize winner and pioneer of in vitro fertilization, died last week at age 87. The work he did in developing in vitro fertilization enabled many women with forms of infertility to conceive and bear children.
Yet much of the Edwards' work remains controversial.
In an article for the Wall Street Journal, Robert P. George examines three categories of Edwards’ critics: people worried about overpopulation, certain feminists who regard Edwards’ work as turning women into machines for incubation and “proponents of the sanctity-of-life ethic, for whom Edwards's experiments to perfect IVF and the actual clinical practice of in vitro involve the deliberate taking of nascent human life.”
For George, one real question surrounding Edwards’ work is who is in charge? Edwards himself stated that his work was “about more than infertility" and “whether it was God Himself or whether it was scientists in the laboratory" who was in control. Edwards supposed his IVF technology provided the answer: "It was us." But according to George, “The real question of ‘who is in charge’ cannot be resolved by proving that something is technically possible. Rather it is whether it is right to or wrong — consistent with or contrary to the dignity of the human being — to do what it may well be technically possible to do.”
- 10 things you never knew about the FBI
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook for...
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- In our opinion: With Shurtleff and Swallow...
- Robert Bennett: Hamas and its financial...
- Letter: Policy disagreement
- Helping kids master what matters: Emotions,...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 112
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 73
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 61
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 49
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 47
- Letter: Policy disagreement 45
- In our opinion: Use market forces and... 34
- The complicated political views of... 33