So if do not care about the cost, an electric car would be the way to go. However, suppose I do care about cost. Imagine I keep my clunker and produce more pollution, but I buy a carbon offset. I need to buy one that actually reduces emissions of CO2 in some other way by an equivalent number of pounds. CO2 offsets trade for between $15 and $40 per metric ton. So I could buy 16,500 pounds of CO2 reduction today for $225 at a price of $30 per metric ton. Over 20 years this would give a reduction of exactly 330,000 pound-years of CO2.
In other words, there are significantly lower-cost methods of reducing carbon emissions than scrapping an otherwise sound older car in favor of buying an electric one.
Kerk Phillips is an associate professor of economics at Brigham Young University. His views do not necessarily represent those of BYU.
- Airport TRAX ridership remains strong weeks...
- Writers offer personal finance advice to Obama
- New app helps consumers purchase products...
- Dick Harmon: Utah analytics company breaks...
- West Davis Corridor project unveiled amid...
- Two new hotels announced for downtown Salt...
- Former middle-class moms choose new identity...
- BLM proposes to open lands near Vernal for...
- Writers offer personal finance advice...
27 - Obama: 'Our focus cannot drift' from...
9 - New app helps consumers purchase...
9 - West Davis Corridor project unveiled...
6 - Airport TRAX ridership remains strong...
6 - Tea party tax returns show small...
5 - IRS probe ignored most influential...
5 - BLM proposes to open lands near Vernal...
4


