Matthew Sanders: How lessons from Easter and Passover should help us preserve religious freedom
Jews in Syria read the Torah, the Jewish holy book as part of the celebration of the Passover, at al-Firenj Synagogue in downtown Damascus, Syria.
Bassem Tellawi, Associated Press
In Cecil B. DeMille's The Ten Commandments, Charlton Heston's Moses famously pleads Pharaoh repeatedly to, "Let my people go!" It was a classic rendition of an ancient clash between the Israelites, who had been a favored people since their predecessor had helped spare Egypt from famine, and a domineering Pharoah, "who knew not Joseph."
The Bible recounts that after Moses' appeal to Pharaoh to release the Hebrews, all firstborns throughout Egypt were slain except those who followed specific instructions given by God. Broken, Pharaoh finally relented and allowed Israel to depart.
To commemorate God's deliverance from Egypt's persecution and bondage, generations of Jewish families have observed Passover, starting on the 15th day of Nissan, typically near the beginning of April.
More than a millenium later, the people of Israel were overseen and oppressed by a complicated partnership between Rome and Herod Antipas, a puppet king of the Jews and grandson of Herod the Great. The people of the time held out hope for one even greater than Moses, a Messiah, who would come to free them for all time.
Jesus of Nazareth emerged, providing "signs and wonders" foretold by ancient prophets. He and His followers were similarly rejected and persecuted by the prevailing powers. During the Easter season, Christians commemorate Jesus' transcendent suffering and resurrection as the ultimate deliverance — from sin and death.
These events are set in times of severe oppression by the prevailing culture and political powers. Pharaoh's stature as both king and diety gave him nearly unlimited power over his subjects. Israel was ruled by a cruel alliance between the Roman procurator, Herod Antipus, and Jerusalem's religious elders.
These cases illustrate the oft-repeated pattern where religious-sponsored states, or state-sponsored religions, succumb to the poisons of power and commit atrocities. As a result, some argue against any religious influence in public dialogue or policy. But anti-religious dogma has also seen its share of horrors, including the French Revolution, Stalinism and Maoism.
Rather than simple-mindedly building a barricade between faith and civic involvement, the Founding Fathers elegantly protected religion while channeling its good aims and passions through carefully crafted electoral and legislative processes to help shape a moral and just society.
With a remarkably brief clause they reframed the age-old debate, where the First Amendment reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This delicate, daring path protects religious practice and expression in the public arena as a key ingredient of liberty.
Alexis de Tocqueville, a French observer of the American experiment in the 19th century, supported the approach by claiming, "Liberty cannot be established without morality, nor morality without faith." John Adams also concluded, "Liberty can no more exist without virtue . . . than the body can live and move without a soul."
They were right. When compared to other lands and times, America has been a dramatic explosion of civil liberty and unrivaled prosperity that has drawn tens of millions to its shores.
As in its infancy, America's hearts and homes and civic life remain deeply moved by faith. According to a 2012 Pew Foundation study, 92 percent of Americans believe in God in some form, including more than 21 percent of atheists and 55 percent of agnostics. Overall, more than 4 out of 5 people signaled an affiliation with a formal religion.
- Top scandals and controversies of each United...
- Robert Bennett: With public trust waning,...
- Top scandals and controversies of each US...
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation of...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- About Utah: Without fanfare, the National...
- Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: How will...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
52 - Letters: Deception and government
31 - Letter: The real death panel:...
29 - In our opinion: Reduce the legal...
26 - In our opinion: Big screen exploitation...
25 - Letters: Paycheck Fairness Act
20 - Matthew Sanders: Imploding trust in...
20 - Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
18



Ahhh yes, the old standby non-sequitur – “our virtue comes from religion.” And then comes the demonstrably false non-sequitur – “our Constitution is a fundamentally religious document.”
Fact one – More..
@Twin Lights
It would have been a better article had you wrote it.
Gets very tiring reading sanctimonious stuff like this that contains the implied premise – “the world is full of wicked and sinful people, except for More..
I can only hope the article writer did not "intentionally" fail to mention Islam, Buddahism, Hindi, Native American, or any of religion for that matter.
Jeudeo-Christian moral codes are just as defined and taught in any other More..