HB271 would have set aside 25 percent of future Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control profits for public education funding. But the bill failed in a 24-47 vote after several lawmakers objected to the earmarking of public funds and expressed concern that the state would be indirectly creating an incentive to purchase and consume alcoholic beverages.
Tom Smart, Deseret News
SALT LAKE CITY — A plan to fund education with revenue from alcohol sales was cut short Thursday by representatives in the Utah House.
HB271, sponsored by Rep. Jim Bird, R-West Jordan, would have set aside 25 percent of future Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control profits for public education funding.
But the bill failed in a 24-47 vote after several lawmakers objected to the earmarking of public funds and expressed concern that the state would be indirectly creating an incentive to purchase and consume alcoholic beverages.
Rep. Ryan Wilcox, R-Ogden, said he was conflicted on the bill. He described Bird's efforts to fund education as a worthy and needed cause but said he's already uncomfortable with the state benefiting from the sale of a product that most lawmakers and their constituents don't believe in consuming without then attaching that revenue to the education of children.
"As much as it hurts me to argue against increased funding for education, I have to stand in opposition to the bill," Wilcox said.
Bird presented the bill as a potential solution to lingering fears over the effects of the pending sequester of federal funds. He said because the bill is based on future profits, the earmark would not pull money away from other state programs but would provide ongoing supplemental funds to schools.
Bird also explained that some DABC revenue is already used to fund education, such as the school lunch program.
"Here's an opportunity, representatives, to be able to put up to $7 million the first year, and more ongoing, into public education without raising a dime of taxes," he said.
Other representatives, including Rep. Dana Layton, R-Orem, took issue with the further earmarking of state funds. Layton said she loves education but opposes the bill from the business perspective that the state should have maximum discretion of its funds.
"We may be able to give that money to education on year-by-year basis," she said. "But there may be years when we need it for other things."
Contributing: Mary Mellor
E-mail: benwood@desnews.com
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet, passes away
- LDS missionary 'stable' following hit-and-run...
- A firsthand perspective: Reflecting on the...
- Mia Love announces she's officially running...
- Mitt Romney to live in Utah — at least...
- Utah facing $1.2 billion-dollar water...
- Fly a flag for Cody: Army confirms Utah man...
- LDS missionary from Sweden suffers aneurysm,...
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet,...
63 - Mitt Romney to live in Utah — at...
45 - Police say driver who hit 3 children...
27 - Angry Orrin Hatch: IRS guilty of...
19 - Utah GOP convention agenda includes...
19 - Attorney General John Swallow says he's...
16 - Mormon missionary age announcement...
14 - Mia Love announces she's officially...
13



So once again, when it comes time to put OUR money where THEIR mouths are, our state legislators balk. It's hard to believe the priority is on education when we avoid common sense solutions to help fund it.
Of course, last year they had no problem with earmarking highway funds with alcohol sales. I don't think the problem is with earmarking funds to aspects of the state budget. The problem is that we have a group of anti-public education More..
What percent of school funding actually filters to the classroom?