Monticello mill victims seek help on Utah's Capitol Hill
Bill asks feds to help with cancer screening
A 1942 historic photo of the mill housing in foreground and the uranium mill can be seen in background. The Monicello mill was closed in 1960 and there has been a high rate of cancer in Monticello residents.
Courtesy photo
MONTICELLO, San Juan County — Bruce Adams and his junior high friends grew up in the dust of this small town in the 1950s and early 1960s, chasing their boredom away by jumping atop sheep or pigs at the local slaughterhouse.
Afterward, in the hot sun, they'd slip into the tailings pond next to the uranium mill to wash away the grime.
People gave it no thought to take the mill tailings and use them as fill, for mortar in home construction, to patch roads or put it in children's sandboxes.
"We had no idea we were putting a stake in our own heart," Adams says now.
A few years into high school, Adams' best friend, Alan Maughan, died of leukemia. That was in 1966, and 33 years before the federal government came in and declared the area so contaminated it put it on the Superfund list.
Today, mill-era residents, both those who stayed in town and those who moved away, continue to come down with cancer and are buried from cancer, often in the same dirt they suspect made them sick so many decades ago.
"These people aren't getting much help," said Sen. David Hinkins, R-Ferron. "What we are doing is putting the federal government on notice that we'd like something to be done to help these people out."
Hinkins has a resolution that will be heard in the Senate Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment Committee meeting at 4 p.m. Monday at Capitol Hill.
The measure, SCR10, urges the federal government to take action to loosen up dollars for cancer screening, education and treatment services to victims of mill tailings exposure from the Monticello mill.
“There was a lot of exposure to people down there,” said Hinkins, who has San Juan County in his district.
A few years back, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, was able to get a measure passed in Congress that provided $210,000 in cancer screening and treatment for residents exposed to radioactivity as well as heavy metals such as arsenic and selenium.
Those screening services, according to Hinkins, resulted in the diagnosis of 39 new cases of cancer and 32 more cases of precancerous polyps.
Adams, chairman of the San Juan County Commission, said that money has since been tapped out, easily consumed by trips residents often have to make to Salt Lake City for services provided by the Huntsman Cancer Institute.
“There’s no more vouchers for cancer screening, but the problem has not gone away.”
Milling of uranium and vanadium ore began in 1941 in Monticello in an effort that was part of the Manhattan project. The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, the predecessor to the U.S. Department of Energy, purchased the mill in 1948. By 1971, 11 years after the mill stopped operating, the federal government was conducting radiological surveys to determine the nature and extent of the contamination associated with mill tailings.
Aside from the actual mill site, the Environmental Protection Agency found 424 contaminated vicinity properties in the residential and commercial areas of Monticello, as well as 34 contaminated properties on rural land downstream from the mill.
An on-site repository constructed under the purview of the EPA holds more than 2.5 million cubic yards of contaminated material.
State water officials continue to have restrictions on the withdrawal of any groundwater in the area because it is not safe to drink.
In 2000, the federal government transferred 383 acres to Monticello, land that includes the mill site and adjacent properties. It sits as open space, reseeded and planted with trees, but no buildings can be put on the land and it is restricted to day use.
- Utah ranks No. 1 for economic outlook for...
- Mistake or miracle: New evidence on the...
- Kennecott lays off roughly 100 workers Thursday
- US companies challenging contraception mandate
- Can't catch a break: America lags behind on...
- Low US energy prices make Euro leaders see green
- 'Mantiques' could be a ticket to more cash
- S.L. draws up airport plans
- S.L. draws up airport plans
33 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
29 - US companies challenging contraception...
19 - Should we let wunderkinds drop out of...
13 - Obama opposes GOP bill on Keystone XL...
11 - IRS official to take the 5th at hearing
8 - Obama threatens veto of Republican...
7 - Utah ranks No. 1 for economic outlook...
7



Boy, some of the respondents seem a little heartless to me. When a highly disproportionate number of residents per capita come down with cancer something needs to be done. My wife was a downwinder from Monticello and 24 years ago at the age of 47 More..
Everyone and every group of people want the federal government to stop spending and start living within its means- as long as it still spends money on their special concern. Time the federal government finds money to fund all these projects our More..
Yet how many of these people are GOP stalwarts who want to cut funding for everything and everyone else?
How many would support doing away with "useless" federal agencies such as the Atomic Energy Commission or EPA?