HB44 sponsored by Rep. Greg Hughes, R-Draper (pictured), would require the disclosure of the entity paying for polls about a candidate or ballot proposition. It also would impose a $100 fine for failure to do so.
Michael Brandy, Deseret Morning News
SALT LAKE CITY — A bill intended to promote transparency in political polling and stop the practice of "push polling" passed the Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee on Friday.
HB44, sponsored by Rep. Greg Hughes, R-Draper, would require the disclosure of the entity paying for polls about a candidate or ballot proposition. It also would impose a $100 fine for failure to do so.
"This type of disclosure is necessary to build public trust," Hughes said. "It's not meant to be a punishment. It's meant to make the process more legitimate."
But Marina Lowe, legal counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah, said the bill could infringe on the First Amendment rights of political groups that administer non-advocacy polls that would not impact elections.
For disclosures to meet requirements of the First Amendment, "they have to further the integrity of the electoral process," Lowe said.
The bill would be on "much firmer constitutional ground" if it included a narrow definition of push polling like in other states with similar laws, she said.
Hughes said that by including all political polls in the definition, the bill increases free speech and fairness.
Brian Chapman, managing director of BCR Political, a political consulting firm, said his organization also opposes the bill.
Chapman said the bill would put an end to double-blind research, which keeps the interviewer from not knowing who paid for the poll and prevents any accidental bias.
He also said the bill would hurt legitimate candidate issue testing, where a campaign polls to test which issues will have traction.
- Josh Powell made 'admission of guilt' in...
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Letters to family show Steven Powell still...
- Couples registry gets preliminary nod from...
- 2 Utah high schools ranked among the best in...
- 4 reasons why you need to paraglide at Point...
- Police locate West Point teen called 'person...
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet, passes away
- Mia Love announces she's officially...
43 - S.L. draws up airport plans
32 - GOP delegates reject changes to...
31 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
29 - XanGo co-founder accuses partners of...
23 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
22 - Search for Susan Cox Powell is over,...
21 - Gov. Gary Herbert tells Washington...
17



Legitimate polls being hurt? LOL!
If a poll is legitimate for reason then why is there any doubt that a legitimate poll could be an illegal poll? If a poll by any means and for any means is being conducted then the laws would apply to both More..
Interesting that they are so concerned about transparency when it comes to polling, because they think Jim Matheson's polling had some impact in his election, but they are unable to pass any meaningful legislation regarding ethics for More..