HB44 sponsored by Rep. Greg Hughes, R-Draper (pictured), would require the disclosure of the entity paying for polls about a candidate or ballot proposition. It also would impose a $100 fine for failure to do so.
Michael Brandy, Deseret Morning News
SALT LAKE CITY — A bill intended to promote transparency in political polling and stop the practice of "push polling" passed the Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee on Friday.
HB44, sponsored by Rep. Greg Hughes, R-Draper, would require the disclosure of the entity paying for polls about a candidate or ballot proposition. It also would impose a $100 fine for failure to do so.
"This type of disclosure is necessary to build public trust," Hughes said. "It's not meant to be a punishment. It's meant to make the process more legitimate."
But Marina Lowe, legal counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah, said the bill could infringe on the First Amendment rights of political groups that administer non-advocacy polls that would not impact elections.
For disclosures to meet requirements of the First Amendment, "they have to further the integrity of the electoral process," Lowe said.
The bill would be on "much firmer constitutional ground" if it included a narrow definition of push polling like in other states with similar laws, she said.
Hughes said that by including all political polls in the definition, the bill increases free speech and fairness.
Brian Chapman, managing director of BCR Political, a political consulting firm, said his organization also opposes the bill.
Chapman said the bill would put an end to double-blind research, which keeps the interviewer from not knowing who paid for the poll and prevents any accidental bias.
He also said the bill would hurt legitimate candidate issue testing, where a campaign polls to test which issues will have traction.
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet, passes away
- Steven Powell will not be released from...
- LDS missionary 'stable' following hit-and-run...
- Mitt Romney to live in Utah — at least...
- LDS Church submits temporary Provo MTC plans...
- LDS missionary from Sweden suffers aneurysm,...
- Man who allegedly taught bomb making in Utah...
- Psychologist calls doctor accused of killing...
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet,...
53 - Mitt Romney to live in Utah — at...
44 - Police say driver who hit 3 children...
27 - Angry Orrin Hatch: IRS guilty of...
19 - Utah GOP convention agenda includes...
19 - LDS missionary from Sweden suffers...
18 - LDS missionary 'stable' following...
17 - New law banning teen drivers from...
16



Legitimate polls being hurt? LOL!
If a poll is legitimate for reason then why is there any doubt that a legitimate poll could be an illegal poll? If a poll by any means and for any means is being conducted then the laws would apply to both More..
Interesting that they are so concerned about transparency when it comes to polling, because they think Jim Matheson's polling had some impact in his election, but they are unable to pass any meaningful legislation regarding ethics for More..